Authenticity??

[gran]

Help identify.

AUTHENTICITY RIBUTATSII question??
> > >

From SW ..

[Toinen]

Сообщение от gran

Authenticity??

Appropriate to speak not about the authenticity of this paper, the reliability of the information contained therein.

[gran]

Сообщение от Toinen

It is more appropriate to speak not about the authenticity of this paper, the reliability of the information contained therein.

About

Absolutno correctly ....

Добавлено через 23 минуты
Photos from the bad pictures, well At least it would be understandable ochem question.

[gran]

Photos from the bad pictures, well At least it would be understandable ochem question.

[Toinen]

Сообщение от gran

pictures with bad pictures

Joke appreciated!

[Pecheneg]

Сообщение от Toinen

is more appropriate to speak not about the authenticity of this paper, the reliability of the information contained therein.

Well, perhaps this conclusion should be accompanied by examination of the object, and then visual eksperiza does not prove anything.

[Toinen]

Сообщение от Pecheneg

visual eksperiza does not prove anything

I agree!
In form and content of this paper is more like a certificate from the housing department.

[redbor]

Сообщение от Toinen

I agree!
In form and content of this paper is more like a certificate from the housing department

Very strange paper.
Why there is described by frame?
And the price is another picture?
 
"Expert opinion" about the picture, but the images picture no.

That is, you can use any picture ...

[gran]

As it says in the conclusion

* Works of the artist in Russia, * NO

So we can determine authorship kakzhe without analogue of such works.

This is what happens??

From SW ...

Added after 3 minutes

Сообщение от redbor

Very strange paper.
Why there is described by frame?
And the price is another picture?
 
"Expert opinion" about the picture, but the images picture no.

That is, you can use any picture ...

Yes and no number ..

[Сима]

Сообщение от redbor

Very strange paper .

Yes , I agree . For 2005 and the capital's museum of more than strange. 90-95 , in the last century is written. Then, as a cunning twist. I can not believe that GIM - country nepuganyh turtles so much to give evidence at the picture of the artist, whose standards are not available in the country. Although the author may be so skilled that he remembered the manner of the masters of foreign experience? This also can not be denied . However, the mention of "visual" examination shows some sophistication still - so you can not make a claim on the technology . But on the other hand, the " visibility " is a contradiction with the mention of something " technical and technological " ( signs ???). And the fact that no number on the document, it is not strange . This means that the museum as a whole did not support the institute expertise and individual staff support . > A museum closed his eyes. It is quite common situation to the " misery."