Interesting

[Jasmin]

I've just received this message in a soap, I hasten to share, can someone be interested

  Si Frumkin
> Demographic fails, or Lost Continent
>
> Part I
>
>
> A friend sent me from England, the English translation published in the Danish-language interview with a German professor Gunnar Heinsohn,> advised to read it, despite the possible depressive reaction. > I did not want to read 16 pages because I have and so> has accumulated a lot of unread. But looking at the beginning, I was not able to> come off.
>
> The interview was taken at the exit in 2003, his sensational> book: "The sons and world domination: the role of terror in the rise and fall of> Nations" (Sohne und Weltmacht: Terror im Aufstieg und Fall der Nationen). > This book became a bestseller around the world, but in English so far> has not been translated. In the preface to the book is a quote of contemporary German philosopher, who believes that this book is no less important, and> significant than the "Capital" of Karl Marx.
>

Читать дальше... 

> After reading this, I immediately went to Google and found out that the author -> 63-year-old professor at the University of Bremen, a sociologist, economist and> researcher genocide. He wrote many books about the sunrise and sunset> civilizations from the Bronze Age, Ancient Greece, the Middle East> and Buddhist countries, and ending with the Holocaust and modern Europe.
>
> In his book, "Sons and world domination," he explains> phenomenon that spawned an unexpected and inexplicable wave of terrorism and> violence that shatters at the present time, our world, calling it> the phenomenon of "malignant priority population of young people" (Youth> Bulge).
>
> The definition of this phenomenon is confirmed by elementary mathematical> calculations - comparing the number of men aged 40-44 years with> boys aged 0 to 4 years. The demographic problem occurs> when for every 100 men aged 40-44 years account for> less than 80 boys aged 0 to 4 years. In Germany, this> ratio is 100/50, and in the Gaza Strip - 100/464.
>
> Heinsohn uses the term "demographic crash" to> describe the country, which will be unable to resist the> priorities of young people from other countries. Germany and Japan are demographically> willing to surrender countries, such as Muslim - Afghanistan (100> male /403 boys), Iraq (100 male /351 boys) and Somalia (100> male /364 boys).
>
> Violence tends to occur in societies where young men from 15 to> 29 years constitute more than 30%of the total population. The reasons - religion,> nationalism, Marxism, fascism, that is the name of what is administered is> violence - are insignificant. Now the world has 67 countries with> priority population of young people, 60 of them are already happening or> mass genocide or civil war.
>
> Heinsohn does not believe that the economic and humanitarian assistance to countries with> priority population of young people can prevent war,> social unrest, terror or mass murder. On the contrary, in> some cases this assistance provided with the most> best of intentions, is the cause of violence. He regretted the decision to> America to send troops to Iraq and Afghanistan, he believes a campaign to> intervention in Darfur completely useless. Heinsohn advises> to convey to the Palestinians that the West will no longer have to pay them> for unlimited childbearing, that they themselves would have to feed their> families with 10 or more children. It also condemns the widespread> theory of the western elite, which provides that all violence in the geographic> belt from North Africa to the Philippines, as well as the distribution of> terrorism in the rest of the world due to unresolved> Arab-Israeli conflict. Starving people do not fight, they tolko> suffer. But the violence - a predictable and inevitable
>
> The result in cases where young people are well fed and live in society,> where there are too many and where they contend with this very society,> because they realize that it is unable to reclaim them.
> In recent years, the West was faced with a huge priority for young people in> much of the Muslim world, where there is a population> explosion. Within just five generations (1900-2000 gg.) Population in> the Muslim world rose from 150 million to 1200 million,> which is more than 800%. For comparison: the population of China grew from> 400 million to 1200 million (300%), while India's population - with> 250 million to 1000 million (400%). Between 1988 and 2002 in> developing countries, 900 million were born sons, and hotspots> become almost predictable: the Taliban before the coup in 1993>, the population of Afghanistan grew from 14 to 22 million; in Iraq in 1950> there were 5 million people, and Now there is 25 million, despite the> permanent war for a quarter century, since 1967> population in the West Bank and Gaza Strip increased from 450,000 to 3.3> million, with 47%of them - 15 years young! By the end of life of the current> generation
>
> Afghanistan will be the same number of boys younger than 20 years, as in France and> united Germany combined. Palestinian aggression recent> months and years can not be explained by the Israeli "occupation" (at the end of> all, it began 30 years ago), poverty (the most aggressive> regions of the Muslim world are not the poorest), or humiliation. It's just> violence in the name of violence.
>
> Admittedly, the movement of Hitler and Mussolini, the early Bolsheviks,> the Maoist movement in China and many other massacres and war> were not the result of the priority population of young people. But if> the Germans after 1945, fertility was the same as in the period between> 1900 and 1914, now the population of Germany amounted to some 500> million people, and about 80 million would have on the young> aged 15 to 29 years (now in this age group with 7> million). We can ask the question: would behave this 80 million> as peacefully as the current 7 million, or they would want to return> Germany Breslau (now Wroclaw), Danzig (Gdansk), Konigsberg> (Kaliningrad), who went to Poland and USSR in 1945-1946.?
>
> The Palestinians - is the most striking example: they get more> of international aid per capita than any other displaced> persons or refugees, as every Palestinian family income is calculated> on the number of children. Thus, children - not a material burden, and> vice versa - an excellent source of income. Meanwhile, in Lebanon, Tunisia,> Algeria, Iran, Turkey, Emirates, and in some other countries> birthrate dropped to 2 children in the family, because there> include and educate children - a very expensive pleasure. And although in> these countries still have a "surplus" of young people who> were born earlier, a few years the priority population of young people> will be liquidated and cease to be dangerous.
>
> Changes in the American system of Welfare demonstrate how to> "fix" demographic crash. In 1935 the U.S. passed a law> Help for dependents, which is guaranteed assistance from the state> of every mother with minor children in families where the husband or> died or became disabled. While any woman, white or black,> was ashamed to receive from the public benefit of illegitimate children. > But by 1965, the social ethics had changed: the man in the family of unemployed> mother became a hindrance, while illegitimate children to generate income. > Number of families receiving Welfare, has increased dramatically. From 1965 to 1995> years, their number amounted to 10%of all U.S. households, and the number> of illegitimate children - 15%of all children. Since most> dependents were blacks, the following explanation of the problem:> it, they say, is caused by the black gene, although the statistics of the birth of illegal> Children and teenage pregnancy in the first half century for the> little black
>
> Different from the rate for whites. In 1997 he joined the> force a new law providing for the Welfare of women and their children> for only five years. The recipient was given a choice:> either be on Welfare five consecutive years, or break the time limit for> several shorter periods. Around the law has been much debate:> Several senior officials in the Clinton administration> resigned in protest, thereby against what they regarded as> an attack on the most defenseless - single mothers and their children. The experts> predict that by 1997-1998, the number of recipients Welfare> increase from 12 million to 14. In fact, this prediction is> showed an example of the racist attitudes of the liberals with good> intentions, which did not expect rational behavior from> blacks. In fact, black girls were quite> reasonable to take contraceptives, and the number of> velferschikov decreased from 12 million to $ 4. This allowed
>
> Take the law's most successful social reform in American> history.
>
> Part II
>
> Ideology, religion and immigration - what comes first, that a second?
> Ideology. In 1500-ies the small European countries, starting with> Portugal and Spain began to conquer large parts of the world. > There is a mistaken belief that it happened because of overpopulation. > In fact, no overpopulation was not: in 1350 the population> Spain was 9 million, and in 1493, when we started> gains - only 6 million. However, in this period in the family> noted a sudden increase in the number of children. The fertility rate has> increased from 2.3 children per family to 6.7 children, once in 1484> Pope's decree was announced that artificial birth control> punishable by death. As a result, the average age of the population, amounting to> 28-30 years old in 1350, dropped to 15 years in 1493. Now in the family> had too many boys, not knowing what to exert their strength, and> many "preferred" to become colonizers and conquerors. 95%> conquistadors (in Spain they were called "secundones" - the latter's sons)> were very young. They could
>
> Calculate the sin to destroy or oppress the conquered peoples, but> religious mandarins were told them that they are not murderers, but the fighters for> justice, which must destroy the pagans and sinners with a clear> conscience and with the permission of the authorities.
>
> Heinsohn calls these invaders "hristianistami" (Christianists), and> not just Christians that can draw an analogy with modern> "Islamists" (Islamists) and the Muslims. Heinsohn emphasizes that the> young people are looking and willing to accept an ideology that> excuse and absolve them of responsibility: "When the time will become imminent,> will be written, new religious pamphlets and books. Of these holy books,> whether the Koran, the Bible," Mein Kampf "," Communist Manifesto "and> so on, takes something that justifies your goal. You know what you're going> to do violence, but you want while your conscience is not troubled. you> kill the good ideas and therefore, you - the righteous. But when a young> ceases to be in the demographic superiority, then these books,> printed in millions of copies, the interest is completely lost:> all already know that, apart from ideological rubbish, there's nothing there.
>
> However, in the priority population of young people, this is the> young people become deaf to the arguments of reason and conscience. Wrong> ideas do not come from Scripture, they are created by young> people, because they need the wrong ideas to justify their> actions. Consequently, they can not stop, explaining that their> ideas are wrong. Movement does not create the wrong ideas. Instead,> the wrong ideas are born in response to the need for movement. Islamism> created not by Islam, and young Muslims. "

>
> Immigration. Europe's immigration problems are dual: on the one> hand, the most energetic and brightest are leaving, and the birth rate> is very low, on the other hand, immigrants from the Third> World does not have sufficient education, and multiply at an accelerated> pace.
>
> Now the Germans, Dutch, French emigrate from their countries as> ever. Only in Germany every year leaving 150,000 people, with> most of them go to the Anglo-Saxon countries. Every year, Canada,> Australia and New Zealand willing to accept 1.5 million> educated immigrants and do everything possible to facilitate their> entry to their countries. Professor Heinsohn is not showing in this regard> is no surprise: "It is not surprising that young hardworking people in> France and Germany choose to emigrate, and not only because it> on their shoulders rests the duty to" feed "the aging native population> own country. If we take the 100 twenty-year French and> German, 70 of them also contain 30 immigrants of their> own age, as well as their offspring. For many it is simply> unacceptable, especially in France, Germany and the Netherlands. That's> why they are running.
>
> Current criteria for the adoption of European immigrants are as> follows:
> 1) Are they the victims of discrimination?
> 2) Do they have relatives in Europe?
> 3) If they have entered into Europe illegally, they should be legalized,> and
>
> 4) - the least important - the immigrant must be relevant labor market.
> Germany - only one example of billions of losses due to lack> of skilled labor. It has two million available> vacancies that there is no one to fill, and at the same time on programs> Welfare sit 6 million dependents. In France, for every woman> has two children, but out of every five newborns, two children> born of Arab or African women. In Germany, 35%of all> infants are not Germans, 90%of serious crimes committed> not the Germans. In Tunisia, for each woman had 1.7 children. In> France, it can afford to have six children, because the> French government pays her generous allowance for each. > Canada's immigration policy is diametrically opposed> Europe: each new Canadian who comes from abroad, should> respond sufficiently high educational and professional> standards. As a result, 98 out of 100 Canadian adult immigrants have> a better professional qualifications than the average Canadian. In
>
> Germany and France, a similar figure is only 10%.
> In Europe, everything went the wrong path somewhere in the early 1980's. In> Germany, major changes have occurred in the 1990's, when the> immigration became a mass: between 1990 and 2002 Germany entered> 13 million immigrants, most of them unskilled> working. The same thing happened in France. Remove this burden> welfare of the state budget is possible only through> legislation. It is necessary to enact a law whereby children> born after a specified date, must be content to not have> the state, but from their parents. It will be a revolution. But such> a revolutionary way in Europe, not even discussed. "
>
> Professor Heinsohn is not optimistic for the future and little that> can advise. He would like to see more immigration from China, but> it also recognizes that an educated Chinese are unlikely to seek to> live in a country where they will have to feed as many dependents. He rejects the> possibility of armed resistance if the economy> European countries will crumble under the pressure of immigrant slackers: "Who> is left to fight?" All the young people at that time would go. " > The professor leads to a survey conducted in 2005> in Germany: 52%of the age group 18-32 want to leave. > The only people who are faithful and loyal defenders of the current> social structure in France, Holland, the Scandinavian countries> and in Germany, is living on Welfare. They recognize: "Nowhere in the world about us> so take care not to be."
>
> I agree with everything. Unfortunately, the reasons for optimism about the> future of Europe is too small. I can only hope that America can not> will follow the example of Europeans, and that we still have time to understand> that the system we are currently trying to implement,> provides a preference for a talented, intelligent,> educated and capable, and that This system will lay the foundation of our> future, which can be much lighter than the one that> threatens old Europe - the continent losers.