A.V.Kuprin?

[Alkalan]

Dear forum!
It is interesting to know your opinion on the submitted picture.

Kuprin, AV
Oil on canvas 47h105

[John Preston]

Painting is good quality.

On authorship will not say - just do not know.
<! - ~ 10 ->

[Toinen]

Cool painting. I think that this is indeed A. Kuprin . Rather , the picture belongs to the later period of the artist .

Perhaps the only thing a bit disturbing - is a signature made ​​with white paint (not a slap in the UV ?) .
( Photos By increasing the image blurs and nothing can be argued )

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от Toinen

Cool painting. I think that this is indeed A. Kuprin . Rather , the picture belongs to the later period of the artist .

Perhaps the only thing a bit disturbing - is a signature made ​​with white paint (not a slap in the UV ?) .
( Photos By increasing the image blurs and nothing can be argued )

This picture has nothing to do Kuprin . Not to late or to early . It does not even fiftieth . Not Kuprin, definitely!

[Toinen]

Actually - I've seen those greenbacks, malosezannistye, late A.Kuprin landscapes.

[тутмос]

ETA KARTINA NICHEGO OBSHEGO NE IMEET S TVORCHESTVOM KUPRINA.
NE RANNEGO NE POZDNEGO.

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от Tyutchev

This picture has nothing to do Kuprin.

and not only to him.

[Aleks-art]

Elena Varnavovny Nagaevskoy have similar raboty.Skorey all the work belongs to its ruke.S HC ..

[ANTIK]

Not Kuprin!