Cazeau auction in Paris

[Игорь Гурьев]

December 21 in Paris will be Russian auction auction house Cazeau (Cazo).

There is now an expert Tatiana Barysheva, pushed out of Thuja.

Dominated by Russian books, but there are fine art.

http://www.cazo.fr/

I wonder what they think friends of the portrait, attributed to Petrov-Vodkin, occurring from the collection of S. Schuster?

(He is on the first page of theirs site).

Here it is:

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от "Guriev, Igor

I wonder what they think friends of the portrait, attributed to Petrov-Vodkin, occurring from the collection of S. Schuster?

Yuri A. Rusakov believed that this portrait - the work of Petrov-Vodkin.

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky; 1430391"

Yuri Rusakov believed that this portrait - the work of Petrov-Vodkin.

Of course, she recalls Petrov-Vodkin, but the texture smear - not very similar.
In the Petrov-Vodkin was not as stiff a smear, especially after the revolution (and to date it can be a post-Revolutionary painting, Comrade. Syzran, what do you think?).

Confusing and some applicative person on toxic blue background and the border itself faces and background.

Drawn, of course, amazing, but what can I say for the Petrov-Vodkin?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Igor Sasha, pevoe - I will answer you with a display of examples, but my post had disappeared.
It's a sign.
Since, as a second, you ask the question casually, without pictures, but I have this link on your somewhere out there to dive, flip through the catalog, look at this picture and think, then again, to see go to these links again to seek out one lot, look-look out there something else ... To horseradish goat accordion? Huh?

Good, you want answers, ask the question properly. Annoyed because he found three similar heads (pre-revolution) and his post, apparently, erased because of that torn Sazo.

[fabosch]

Tob. Sasha, in my opinion, if you do not analyze, and rely solely on the whole impression of the work - it's not Petrov-Vodkin.
That, of course, does not exclude the possibility that it could be quite the same Petrov-Vodkin, just not very distinctive.
Anyway, if I liked the Petrov-Vodkin, I would not for this fight.

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

you ask the question casually, without pictures, but I have this link on your somewhere out there to dive, flip through the catalog, look at this picture

My God, he's opened by one link, and will not have to dive, etc.

A copy of it I just could not, I do not know how to copy it there.

Added after 2 minutes

Сообщение от fabosch

Tov. Sasha, in my opinion, if you do not analyze, and rely solely on the whole impression of the work - it's not Petrov-Vodkin.

Here I am about the same.
 

That, of course, does not exclude the possibility that it could be quite the same Petrov-Vodkin, just not very distinctive.

I Petrov-Vodkin's love life they do and how does not seem to feel his way.

Well it is not.

Excellent work, school Petrov-Vodkin.
But it is the same Petrov-Vodkin, like Mantegna, for example.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от "Guriev, Igor

Oh my God, he's opened by one link, and will not have to dive, etc.

By clicking on the link opens an auction site, and then have to go to the directory and browse through it to the portrait.
Who needs it?
You or someone else?

I'm not right, Igor Sasha?

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Clicking on a link opens an auction site, and then have to go to the directory and browse through it to the portrait. Who needs it? You or someone else?
I'm not right, Igor Sasha?

Yes, you're wrong, because the portrait on the front page.
What I said in the first message in this thread.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

Yes, you're wrong, because the portrait on the front page.
What I said in the first message in this thread.

There's only an image without a description of size, technology ...
You may need such details are not important, but I'm here, sorry, they are required to present a thing in real life.

[Игорь Гурьев]

Well, this portrait, there will not be copied, had a roundabout way.


I have it dated from 1925 to 1930.

Offhand - 1927.