"Artist's shit" from the Tar Catherine

[Nedogonov]

Almost straight from the tin intellectual product of Katherina Tar, an art critic, curator, chief-editor section of art portal OpenSpace.ru.

• The traditional left in the past, those who practiced today, involved a kind of fishing. There is still Palekh boxes and Khokhloma - so that's "modern traditional art" as you put it in the same status.

• "Artist's shit" is a work of art, not the artist's shit, because it invested considerable intellectual force of the author and the hundreds of art historians and philosophers who have written about this and write.

• Art is no longer connected with the idea of beauty.

• The criterion of success of the artist - this is (apart from talent, which no one has repealed) of his consciousness. He must understand that doing and be able to explain it. In this he differs radically from the artist's past, which were supposed to "moo with delight, and silent

• Vasnetsov and Aivazovsky painted very badly, I tell you as a professional art historian and expert on the art of 19 century. And even then people said: compare modern daub with the work of Titian.

• Painting once was (before the Renaissance) and there and now as a separate art form.

• Art - this is not some kind of title (something that is better than no art). Art - this is such a professional field. This is something that is exhibited in museums and galleries.

They were all quotes. Completely read the press conference materials can be reached at: http://lenta.ru/conf/degot/