FG Toropov, help assess the still life

[Alpha1147]

All welcome.
In the hands of a given work of art, with two expert opinions about the authenticity.


More specifically: the artist Thomas Toropov Gavrilovic, the picture in 1854.

[Alpha1147]

Second Opinion on the Art Consulting

[Alpha1147]

Yes, it can generally do not hurry.
>

[Konstantin]

Сообщение от Alpha1147

Yes, it can generally do not rush.

Charge you for some reason, removed their answers, but his doubts had every right to express.
Here for comparison:

[Alpha1147]

Here 's a thing - you to assess the authenticity spent a few minutes - even for comparison ( this is generally why ? ) Provided an example.

I certainly understand that you say that the Art Consulting - utter nonsense , and their expertise in general or about chem.Navernoe because there are sitting mediocrity , this is understandable.

But why, then, from this organization ( which is understandable fuckers sitting ) has received an offer to purchase for $ 35,000 (a total of four such proposals , but this is the fastest and smallest )?

If so , they offer money , personally I have questions about the authenticity simply can not arise. I have another question arose - and how much it can really cost you, because what is offered to me - maybe , baryzhnoy , at the price .

In short, if you can take for granted (even spherical vacuum) that is a real picture , not fake. And if you can just knock out judgments about stoimosti.A then call her at least ten times a fake ...

[uriart]

Alpha1147, if you actually offered the money (which I deeply doubt it!), You would rejoice, and give.

After the second time and will not offer these!

[Konstantin]

Сообщение от Alpha1147; 1879761"

can you take for granted (even spherical vacuum) that is a real picture , not fake. And if you can just knock out judgments about stoimosti.A then call her at least ten times a fake ..

That's just it?
Fake your picture , no one called , except you.

Сообщение от Alpha1147; 1879591"

Yes it can no Toropov

Comparison with the other picture Toropov , telling all sides. Before you write something more - a question for you :
- Which of your picture is better? One is your , the second was sold at a large western auction .

[Alpha1147]

How do you say - in my personal understanding , if there are justifiable doubts as to authenticity, these doubts can be expressed in one word , which I used , but for some reason you reacted angrily enough , except that I now so no one called . This meant, but in a milder forme.No in my opinion this is a purely personal one and the same.


As for the examples given by you - then of course there is a big difference is immediately obvious . It can not even discuss it. The question , in my opinion in the other - why not admit the idea that the picture presented me too Toropova hand , it is also bylo.Vot loud and all at once swept aside ...

[Konstantin]

Сообщение от Alpha1147; 1879961"

Regarding the above example, you - then of course there is a big difference is immediately obvious .

Now you will understand the price range that I sounded. Laid me painting was exhibited at Christies in 2009 with an estimate (7252 - 10 153 USD, 5307 - 7430 EUR) and did not sell . Do you think your in this case can cost three /four times more? And your picture is much " easier " to do the same. Art Consulting subscribed to our database auction sales [/URL], and this means that you can in good conscience give them a picture of a 35 000 $.

[Alpha1147]

Thanks for the info.
I would seriously think about.