What are the critics?

[Peter]

As an artist and a man who love art, I have often wondered what the critics want? "What they show in their works that are not visible to the eye, what can not be understood looking directly at the work of art? How do their views contribute to the creativity of an artist, but the other puts an end? This subjective view, or attempt an objective analysis of creativity? I would like to hear from the critics and art historians.

[Игорь Гурьев]

What could be simpler?

The task of the critic - to give information about the artist, as well as to express in words how he perceives the art.

That's it.

If a critic - an interesting personality and knows how to write, his texts on art will be interesting and different.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

The task of the critic - to give information about the artist

This is a task of the historian of art.

[Art-ort]

Now all the critics and criticism is essentially an art dealer, but before they performed the ideological task of the party in engaging 'the people' to 'true art. "That's all .

[Peter]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

What could be simpler?

The task of the critic - to give information about the artist, as well as express in words how he perceives the art.

True, but expressing his views on the work of a critic of the artist becomes his tolkovatelem.Etakim intermediary between artist and audience massoy.Lyudi beginning to see the artist (his paintings)
through the prism of criticism, which may not always be objective.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Peter

People are beginning to see the artist (his paintings)
through the prism of criticism, which may not always be objective.

One might think that "people" read the critics.

Added after 2 minutes

Сообщение от Peter

What a mediator between the artist and the spectator mass.

Where is that "The mass of spectators?

[Peter]

Well written the same article, published biographies, research tvorchestva.Odnogo my friend "investigated." I was told that his work comes from Pirosmani, and he himself always fancied impressionist .

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Peter

Well written the same article, published biographies, studies of creativity.

I suspect that yes, all this is written ...
But "whether it be"? How is this a "viewing masses?

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzranskiy

This is a task of the historian of art.

Art historian studies the history of art, and the critic says and informs him about contemporary art.

Added after 2 minutes

Сообщение от Peter

expressing their views on the work of a critic of the artist becomes his tolkovatelem.Etakim intermediary between the artist and the spectator mass.

Ideally, the critic should be an ideal spectator, able to express their feelings, rather than "mediator."

Added after 2 minutes

Сообщение от Peter

expressing their views on the work of a critic of the artist becomes his tolkovatelem.Etakim intermediary between the artist and the spectator mass.

Ideally, the critic should be an ideal spectator, able to express their feelings, rather than "mediator."

[Peter]

And what does the ideal audience?