Pisemsky, Alexey

[kornilyev]

Help determine the price.
22h26. Oil. Bulletin of mahogany.

[аркан]

This is not Pisemsky.

[U_Z]

Сообщение от kornilyev

Pisemsky, Alexei Alexandrovich

Of course, not him. I mean, can the light was still on the artist AA Pisemsky, but we do not think about it.

[Артём]

In general, the work is very pleasant, professional!

Added after 2 minutes 29 minutes

Сообщение от U_Z

Of course, he is not.

Arguments. Why did not he? A signature is not his, but it is nothing said. Suppose some Basil signed. And? And here the work itself?

[Госпожа]

In my opinion, the work is weak, written in broad strokes without kokogo an attention to detail. In Pysems'kogo all worked out, the first plan always was registered in detail (grass, flowers). The trees in this work, in general, any planar, there is no way of space, a little too primitive, boat, generally feel that a couple of strokes written or nuances or what not.
Here's our two processing to compare:

[U_Z]

Сообщение от Artem

Arguments. Why did not he? A signature is not his, but it is nothing said. Suppose some Basil signed.

I agree, instead of "of course, is not he." I ought to write the following: "In my opinion, not AA Pisemsky.
Excuse me, but if some work, but we saw a lot of them here, will be a signature, for example, "Stozharau" I also need to prove that it is not. Anyone who puts his signature on this work and to work Stozharau (Stazharau, in this case, it is a good example) not even close to feeling manner, culture, writing, etc. artist.

PS: I assume already tired of looking at the signature "L. Turzhansky, even in jobs with attribution of experts and organizations.

[Артём]

Сообщение от "Madam, 1042171

In my view, the work is weak

First, (good treatment is obtained ) job well. What you have shown - this thoughtful picture, and the work shown by the author topic - this is nature studies! You've seen a lot of sketches Pysems'kogo? I'm not. And the fact that it is not Pisemsky I can not say the same as that - it Pisemsky. And what you do not like the boat? Another point that the work cheap, but it could be fooled by him.eksp., Compare paint tree trunks with the signature.

[Госпожа]

In my opinion, it is simply oversubscribed work, Chem. examination will not change anything, it can only indicate that the layer of paint and canvas or older, or younger than the expected date. And even if it coincides with the assumption that this proves not opravergnit authenticity.
Assuming that this sketch, then why sign it once it is either a working version, or not finished.
In any case, the authenticity of the painting can argue ad infinitum, and lead, different argument: the less successful work, but the author, not a finished sketch it.d. Commercial values it represents, not for katolozhnyh sales of such work packs sold, and the more it raises doubts.
Then leave it to your court, but she does not convince me.