The most popular sizes of paintings - Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство

Seriy · 14.10.2009, 21:38

Do not share my views on this issue?
What sechas most favorite customer size-30x20 cm?
60x80? 195h320?
Picasso, for example, are rarely written huge size - unless it specifically for specific needs. And one way or 180h100 or 50x60 are very common. But I (courtesy forumchanki) read the book 100 modern names ukrhudozhnikov, so completely cyclopean dimensions! a fashion or prestige, or a real market need, T e do not take an artist 40x50 cm, but snatch the same 150h280?
But what about the size of the apartments?

Jasmin · 14.10.2009, 21:42

Цитата:

Сообщение от Seriy

But what about the size of the apartments?

Seriy, in a large apartment to buy large paintings, and compact - small paintings. So logic dictates.

Кирилл Сызранский · 14.10.2009, 21:54

Цитата:

Сообщение от Jasmin

big flats buy large paintings, and compact - small paintings.

Accurately and simply.

Seriy · 15.10.2009, 08:33

I also tend to think that fashion is the size. For example, square 100x100, 120x120 rare in old masters, and now square paintings became popular. A circle or a rounding of the upper part of the picture, on the contrary, virtually extinct. And the oval? So popular in the 19 century ... Auu ..
In the postwar Soviet artists full size 20x30, contemporary artist working in such amount does not write, at least 40x60.

SergeiSK · 15.10.2009, 08:46

Цитата:

Сообщение от Seriy

I'm inclined to think that fashion is the size.

I am also inclined to this view. Another said that now more prevalent not only square, but the vertical pattern. Horizontal fewer. You are right - any time, and this painting. And size, respectively

14.10.2009, 21:38	Язык оригинала: Русский #1
Seriy Гуру Регистрация: 26.03.2009 Адрес: Москва-Киев Сообщений: 7,078 Спасибо: 4,985 Поблагодарили 6,613 раз(а) в 2,177 сообщениях Репутация: 12970	The most popular sizes of paintings Do not share my views on this issue? What sechas most favorite customer size-30x20 cm? 60x80? 195h320? Picasso, for example, are rarely written huge size - unless it specifically for specific needs. And one way or 180h100 or 50x60 are very common. But I (courtesy forumchanki) read the book 100 modern names ukrhudozhnikov, so completely cyclopean dimensions! a fashion or prestige, or a real market need, T e do not take an artist 40x50 cm, but snatch the same 150h280? But what about the size of the apartments?

Похожие темы
Тема	Автор	Разделы	Ответов	Последние сообщения
Insurance Art	Юрий_Н	Insurance	4	08.04.2010 20:25
World's ugliest buildings	SergeiSK	Chatter	2	13.10.2009 12:43
Standard sizes stretchers	LCR	Restoration	63	09.07.2009 18:37
Named the most popular museums	SergeiSK	Exhibitions and events	0	30.03.2009 12:52
The most influential personalities of the world art community	Евгений	Exhibitions and events	2	15.12.2008 10:08

15.10.2009, 08:33	Язык оригинала: Русский #4
Seriy Гуру Регистрация: 26.03.2009 Адрес: Москва-Киев Сообщений: 7,078 Спасибо: 4,985 Поблагодарили 6,613 раз(а) в 2,177 сообщениях Репутация: 12970	I also tend to think that fashion is the size. For example, square 100x100, 120x120 rare in old masters, and now square paintings became popular. A circle or a rounding of the upper part of the picture, on the contrary, virtually extinct. And the oval? So popular in the 19 century ... Auu .. In the postwar Soviet artists full size 20x30, contemporary artist working in such amount does not write, at least 40x60.