Maurice Utrillo "Street in Paris"

[yanchikkk]

Hello!

Please help determine if this picture is real.
And what is its approximate price.

Size 37x45, 5 cm

Regards

[Solovlad]

Good time .
yanchikkk, a very big doubts about the authorship .
Do not like the signature , carefully written out on school .
Painting itself , I think , is also not related to the author.
Do not feel the way (spirit , the hand ) of this wizard.
Most likely taken soundly, souvenir painting for foreign tourist and bear the signature of the bungle . Correct .

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Solovlad

carefully written out on school.

And he, by the way, so often, and drew his signature - " diligently, in a school ", especially in the works of the 30s.

[K-Maler]

Сообщение от yanchikkk

Please help identify

Per kilometer shows that this is not Utrillo.

[yanchikkk]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

And he, by the way, so often, and drew his signature - " diligently, in a school ", especially in the works of the 30s.

Thank you, Cyril.
What do you think about the picture itself?

Сообщение от Solovlad

Good time.

yanchikkk,

Thank you

Сообщение от K-Maler

per kilometer shows that this is not Utrillo.

Thank you

[Сергей Мельников]

Maybe you should seek the advice of Shmuilovich (Kopeysk) or Zadonsk (Bobruisk)?
They have something to accurately determine the authenticity of the photos on this.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от yanchikkk

What do you think about the picture itself, is similar to the technique itself?

No, it does not look like technique that can be clearly seen on the fragment with a signature.

[camertus]

I also speak for attribution against Utrillo.
He's much thinner, it's a clumsy imitation or copy.

[Homoludens]

Not even an imitation.