Graphics "amateur"

[L-ana64110]

The artist calls himself an amateur, but is it true?


www.karapetyan.artnow.ru

[zarajara]

Сообщение от L-ana64110

The artist calls himself an amateur , but is it true?

www.karapetyan.artnow.ru

Can and does not learn anywhere else , but when doing something for so many years and if there is a taste and a head - that is professionalism . There are many artists , among the first tier of the twentieth century , who never studied , especially among the Contemporary , but there is perhaps another , yet multi-figure compositions .
 Dora , of course , is felt . I think Karapetyan started with copying , now do not do that , but when something - it was a mandatory part of training.
Incidentally , the same Valentine Podpomogov never studied him at all grade 4 education (this site http://www.podpomogov.am/biograf.htm and here it is on the forum ) .

[color=#666686 " ]Added after 58 minutes[/color]
By the way , L-ana64110, good theme , artists and amateurs, or even
- Effect amateur, it would be interesting to see who Colleagues promptly inserted " and she gladly dug in memory and on the Internet , if you open this topic ( since I started ) . >

[ConSferArt]

I too often have to deal with amateurs.
But we must distinguish where the real amateur, and where the so-called "naive art".
Talent can occur even in those who did not learn anything.
More complicated when he is not among those who received the fundamental artistic training.

[NATA NOVA]

ConSferArt, and that in fact it is: the "talent"?

This is probably as intelligence (in fact there are different) ..

[Самвел]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

and that in fact it is: the "talent"?

This is probably as intelligence (in fact there are different) ..

 
I think with the talent of more or less clear, it is still an innate quality, but what about intellect?

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от Samvel

I think that with the talent of more or less clear, it is still an innate quality, but what about intellect?

Samvel, is more innate than talent!
(IMHO, I have experience)

[ConSferArt]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

ConSferArt, and that in fact it is: the "talent"?

This is probably as intelligence (there are different because )..

I think the talent of intelligence - something innate.
But with the talent of the picture, you can write.
But the intellect in this work, I even know.
>

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от ConSferArt

But how this intelligence to help, I even know.

__________________

Intelligence and answers questions like: "ZAChEMmmm?" Who's to blame?
What to do (and then with it)?

[ConSferArt]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

intelligence and answers questions like: "ZAChEMmmm?" Who's to blame?
What to do (then it)?

Well, probably yes.
In general, intelligence is responsible for more common sense, and talent - a natural expression of their desires and skills.

[Самвел]

Сообщение от ConSferArt

general intelligence is responsible for more common sense

 
And I think that most likely intelligence and common sense do not touch.
Well, for example.
(A healthy body, healthy mind) common sense and intelligence can break down this statement to the nines.