Monticelli, Feininger, Derreyn and others at auction May 29 in France

[iside]

I wanted to please LCR that de Stael is at auction ( as followed from the press release Nicolas de Staël's 1952 Méditerranée - La Ciotat (est. € 700,000-1,000,000)), but somehow it directly on the site in the list of lots it was not . >
Although there is some gap between lots 40 and 101 or I could not understand .
Auction ArtCurial, Hôtel Marcel Dassault
May 29, 2011
May 30, 2011

[fross]

There is, and even video

http://www.artcurial.com/en/asp/full...refno=10331718

[iside]

fross, uh, really Lot 41 - liked >, I wonder why it is not in our catalog?
with 1-40 and 110-214 lots?
Yes, and catalog design is something I'm not very inspiring.
>

[fross]

Сообщение от iside

fross, uh, really Lot 41, wondering why he is not in our catalog?
with 1-40 and 110-214 lots?
Yes, and catalog design is something I'm not very inspiring.
>

Just 41 to 105 lots in the catalog of the modern

http://www.artcurial.com/en/asp/sear...D&sale_no=1973

[iside]

fross, although in 1952 it seems to me de Stael is still not kontemporari as you think?
>

[fross]

Сообщение от iside

fross, although in 1952 it seems to me de Stael is still not kontemporari as you think?
>

Post-war, as a rule, always in the Contemporary, with the exception of those masters, whose main works were in the prewar period.

[LCR]

Сообщение от iside

fross, although in 1952 it seems to me de Stael is still not kontemporari as you think ? >

Well , if Bacon, Hockney , Dibenkorn and Bischoff , O'Keefe and Freud , Auerbach and Kossoff , Rothko and slides ( this list could go on , thank goodness ) - contemporary art, Nicolas de Stael also not ashamed to appear there < ! - ~ 1 ~ - >
Modern art - not only with murakamami Coons , there are great artists .

[iside]

Сообщение от LCR; 1634461"

Well, if Bacon and Hockney, Dibenkorn and Bischoff, O'Keefe and Freud, Auerbach and Kossoff , Rothko and Gorky ( this list could go on , thank goodness) - contemporary art, Nicolas de Stael also not ashamed to appear there

LCR, yes , but I think he is still in its essence, the soul ( and as a consequence of painting ), it differs from them and closer to those who worked in the beginning of the century . As that is how I perceive it .