Цитата:
Сообщение от Maroussia
Could not agree more . Only in my opinion this applies to all Russian avant-garde Russian word can be omitted , although it appeared in the title is no accident.
And I'm not in any way do not try to belittle the richness of artistic life in various cities of Russia and Russia in the twenties .
I do not understand the desire to divide the phenomenon by some town way principle: in the late twentieth century, from nowhere appeared Ukrainian avant-garde , in the early twenty-first - Kazan , and then wait for what ?
After all, nobody did not occur to divide , say , impressionism Paris' and Farm .
And yet it seems to me that not all the artists who worked in the 10-20 years and have been actively involved in the creative life of the time, were the avant-garde , as well, not all artists of the late nineteenth century were the Wanderers
|
Maroussia absolutely agree with you , you know all the self- critics recently escalated . All of a sudden wanted to do
discoveries, invent new terms , sometimes it takes a ridiculous desire to form. That is not an article , the creative look at art and not something that is fundamentally contrary to established views . Now is the time upstarts ( to this does not apply to art , never heard of him )
The louder you shout , the faster they hear are the principles of our time, all of this is exacerbated by the background of increasing unprofessionalism . Look at the recently published Handbook of avant-garde there are many interesting collisions. For example SV Gerasimov - garde , according to art historian smastyrevshego this article (sorry normal words not found) , probably should
be located in the Russian avant-garde art somewhere between Rodchenko and Popova Klutsis . <! - ~ 1 ~ -> How can indiscriminately to dress in robes of avant-garde , but the temptation is great - too appealing word - "Vanguard" .