Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 20.03.2013, 11:37 Язык оригинала: Русский       #20
Гуру
 
Регистрация: 19.11.2008
Сообщений: 1,302
Спасибо: 346
Поблагодарили 655 раз(а) в 364 сообщениях
Репутация: 1384
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от sdk321 Посмотреть сообщение
Futurism was not interested in people.
The main machine.
Soul in the machines, in their movement.
This is cool!
> Never heard of such a > Although, I heard, but not about painting.

Добавлено через 15 минут
Цитата:
Сообщение от K-Maler Посмотреть сообщение
Your question seems to me a kind of a statement of the collapse of one of the ideas of the avant-garde era. Futuristic ideas were based on positive - social justice, meaningful creative work, freedom, but not anarchy ... etc.
Around this was the message of the slogan ...
After that we had a war, camps, etc.
Contemporary also represent the continuation of the " critique of society," the Wanderers started back and the populists ( whatever they are disowned realism ...)
Futurism was among the utopian mentality ... Today, there is continuing it .
I'm oversimplifying the issue . Again , referring to Cubism. Cubist paintings which consist of ? Simple question, even rhetorically . A picture of how to build the Futurists ? It would not be superfluous philosophy.
Look at the painting by Lentulova ?
__________________
У кого компаньон, у того хозяин. ©




Последний раз редактировалось Балагур; 20.03.2013 в 11:53. Причина: Добавлено сообщение
Балагур вне форума   Ответить с цитированием