[Тютчев]

Petr Kudryavtsev, organizer of the club Developers Building:

"Master plan presented - only investment instrument in which even the specialist is not easy to understand. Today , it is advantageous for developers who know how to work in Moscow, for the developers of the old school. That is, those who tried to quickly get funding in the bank, rapidly build a house and at the same rate to sell. What happens next, a developer does not care.

After the crisis, it became clear that the quality of the building in terms of population - an incredibly important factor. is very important how well the building works in the fabric of the city, is inscribed in the situation. The city authorities have made Moscow a testing ground for the implementation of a very large investment projects, which generate a number of issues - transportation, engineering, social. Much of the blame for going to bed and on the architects: the new buildings, which stand in Moscow, were designed and coordinated it with them. And there are huge complexes with which we in the future will certainly have to understand. An example of such buildings - shopping center "European", undoubtedly urban planning mistake, significantly more difficult transport situation.

In most cases, a monument of architecture, recognized by old and dilapidated, could be restored. It all depends on the volume of investment. If all the extra money being spent by investors and developers to "administrative resources" to put on the restoration of monuments of architecture, we were able to bring to Moscow in order. But the developer is more profitable to tear down the monument of architecture and replace it with a plaster cast - you get more commercially interesting building larger area. Situation where the developer takes a bank loan for the restoration of the building, but instead it breaks down and builds a replica there, too, is possible.

Boris Pasternak, the chief architect of the Center of historical and urban research:

"Vacant lots in the city center almost gone. Lots of architectural monuments - the latter does not use resources to developers. At the end of last year glimmer of hope that the crisis brought down the heavy tread of the destroyers, but we are sadly mistaken. In May it issued an order of the Moscow government evacuated about 113 homes, of which more than 80 - in the central district. They were asked to immediately demolish. in the newspapers an uproar, it appeared that the authorities gave the reverse, but the crash occurred in Sadovnicheskaya embankment, and a monumental house number 80 /2 on Sadovnicheskaya, who a week ago to keep going, quickly demolished together with the fallen neighbor. This order is destroyed decision-making procedure of the demolition of historic buildings. Now for the sentencing of the demolition of historic buildings from the new list quite a few blind photographs, brought officials. Previously required to assess the historical and cultural values at home, order a technical inspection, to prove that the building actually collapses (recognition of an emergency at home does not mean a direct path to demolition). Finally, the commission must submit a demolition project, which replaces the demolished building. If a courtyard house was a two-storey mansion, but his place is expected construction of a ten towers, this would be the point buildings and cause for social unrest - spot the boss, and will not demolish the old house, or at least alter the project bids.

Here is the case with Zaikonospassky monastery. The company, which has a paper authorizing the reconstruction of the underpass, but instead dig 3-storey shopping and entertainment complex under the monastery. It seems that these same owners have already udelali part Kitajgorodskoj wall: instead of one tower to recreate another, thicker, and made it a restaurant. They were caught on the fact that the ancient buildings of the monastery they had left in limbo, dug out from under them all the land together with the foundations of the XIV century, made a 7 thousand meters of retail space, but it's tough as - are built from top to crack and crumble. It is possible that if I had not cracked, then we would not notice anything. I think we do not know what is going on inside 80%of Moscow apartment buildings.

Despite all our recommendations, studies and projects have a feeling that all attempts at least something to keep from the old town little productive. dull corporate-city car has no reverse. The late Alexis Komech, Doctor of Arts, allowing himself to criticize the reconstruction of the Manege, dragged into court on charges of "damaging the reputation of the Moscow government." The mechanism of neutralization of information dissatisfied perfected. Any action against the demolition of the building due to personal greed - or sought a non-existent political subtext, as was the case with the Manege, the hotel "Moscow", or Post Exchange. Then said something like: "It hit a mayor." There is a set of labels, which are mounted quickly, and interest in the media immediately decreases. According to officials, even the indifferent attitude to their own city, if it differs from the views of the authorities, the result of political or commercial involvement, and the main question - who is behind this. "



Kadashevskaya Quay
Was: two-storey building of XVIII-XIX centuries.
So: the building for offices Unyielding