Цитата:
Сообщение от zarajara
artcol, the point is not that there is no manners, but the fact that it is not articulated, is selected.
You see, they themselves say "Guttuzo manner" that is necessary to refer to a particular author to denote manner.
Funny, I remembered how on one discussion in our CX, just at the beginning of the 80s, Ghukas Chubaryan (academic and folk artist), speaking about other people's artist, said "NN, a good artist, just look at life through glasses . And this time he put on his glasses Guttuzo. " <! - ~ 7 ~ -> <! - ~ 7 ~ ->
In a large denomination bill "Guttuzo manner" as a kind of community, characterizes the followers of this manner as imitators, precisely because it is - the author.
In general, K-Maler right way - this is a particular feature of the author, although in such cases, I prefer to say - handwriting.
That would be a controversial matter.
In fact, it's critics blame could not agree on the term, hence the confusion.
|
Guttuzo regularly pops up in threads where he participated DFS - and I understand why.
Any momentum degenerates - there is no tragedy. Moreover, sooner or later turns into its opposite. In this context, the radical artist - something very pertinent. But based on their experience of life and everywhere to see Guttuzo - these are the same "points".
About manners. In the manner of socialist realism as it has no place. Democratic centralism, as bequeathed founder. Optics must be adequate to the object under study. Then the debate will not be in the style of "elephant - it ...".