Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 21.05.2013, 00:25 Язык оригинала: Русский       #45
Старожил
 
Аватар для DSF
 
Регистрация: 05.07.2008
Адрес: Москва
Сообщений: 640
Спасибо: 3,711
Поблагодарили 1,572 раз(а) в 300 сообщениях
Репутация: 2835
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от artcol Посмотреть сообщение
This is not quite true ...
There was also a gradation of technical and methodological , and other ...
I do not understand you . What are the specific terms that characterize these "graduation ."

Цитата:
Сообщение от Sergei burly Посмотреть сообщение
Of Default snapped up because you do not like socialist realism .
I do not like .
Well, not a reason to write 5 pages of " socialist realism was . Yet ."
And if the Russian art of the Soviet period, there is nothing more to classify ?
SW. Sergey burly ! Well, who interferes with " a man digging in manners and style "? <! - ~ 1 ~ ->
The problem is that neither style nor stylistics is not there. What we're trying to explain topikstarter . Personally , I believe that the reason for this - the monotony and impersonality . But maybe I'm wrong? It may just be in the hands of art historians have not yet reached ? "Black Square" obscures one eye ? But if you have your own little list " of manners and style of " masters " socialist realism " , post it , we can agree with him . And we've got you " Read More#" Train <! - ~ 1 ~ ->



DSF вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо DSF за это полезное сообщение:
zarajara (21.05.2013)