Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 19.05.2013, 21:06 Язык оригинала: Русский       #23
Гуру
 
Аватар для zarajara
 
Регистрация: 19.11.2010
Адрес: Ереван
Сообщений: 1,955
Спасибо: 6,603
Поблагодарили 5,060 раз(а) в 1,378 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 33
Репутация: 10186
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от U_Z Посмотреть сообщение
I politely asked (sorry, I deleted the message, if it is someone you can restore the preserved) you do not participate in this thread is then your message.

Because I think the indiscriminate criticism "only" is not productive. Yes, base kombinatovskie /design works - it's awful (by the way, this is what many call "social realism"), but there were masterovitye artists with great mastery of the technique of painting, with its peculiar aesthetics and time dt and etc. ... and one size fits all - do not agree.
Your request did not interfere, because I did not understand the question (almost literally) has emerged as a response to this post is not, and after it's where I just answered your question. http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showpo...01&postcount=6 Therefore also caused confusion not only for me.

If you wrote that you disagree with me, I would not say a word.

And not everyone with the same brush. Art of the late USSR was happening in front of me and I know very well as who and how many received these orders, and prices even remember now (I thought - there is still only remember some on the painting).
By the way, I am not now criticize, and even then beginning, my first article was published in 1982 and since then has regularly published and censored, and then they were not laudatory, so why would I now is the art of praise. <! - ~ 7 ~ ->




Последний раз редактировалось zarajara; 19.05.2013 в 21:11.
zarajara вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 2 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо zarajara за это полезное сообщение: