Цитата:
Сообщение от U_Z
Do you really believe that these works are "monotonous and featureless"?
When I created a theme, I proposed to measure and compare specific work,
|
You are asking about the "manner, technique of writing". From this point of view, the vast majority of artists used exactly the same technique. Roughly speaking, like a worthless, so talented and equipment was alone. It is impossible to distinguish on grounds of "manners" any group of artists to come up with them a kind of definition that distinguishes them from other groups. There are small differences, but they are too vague to qualify for the independent term. Let's say you work shown number 5 is more technically accurate than the work number 10. Some of the more colorful, some - in a low-key scheme. But it will not extend the terminology.
To come up with some general name, not one, two talented artists who need a creative reservoir, need followers, imitators, even working in a certain "style" laid down "founder," there must be something quickly recognizable by many authors. In the Soviet art of the situation is quite different. On the one hand, there is a huge amount of pictures, looking at who can not identify the author, because they do not have a personality (even stranger), on the other hand, there are talented artists who watch as grain chaff exist by themselves. Some were too many others too little. Hence the problems with the terms.
Specifically shown your work is technically identical. About their artistic qualities can not say anything, one must look in real life.