[fross]

Сообщение от qwerty

The main value of their work lies in the fact that they found the strength to deal with the art, which was considered necessary. The elder of them - Samokhvalov, Pakhomov, Lebedev - in the twenties avngardnye develop ideas, then, moving away from irrelevance, have managed to maintain their individuality, develop their distinctive style. Younger doing something different, innovative, not like the others, realizing that in life any good it can not result. It was a time when the whole country was struggling with "formalism" in art, and most leaders dutifully lining up for rations and titles. Even the great rebels-bubnovovalettsy Mashkov, Lentulov, Kuprin and Konchalovsky steel punch boredom and mediocrity. Sterligov same, for example, passing through the camp, did not abandon its ideas and the end of life developed ideas of organics. Estesstvenno, one post can not summarize all that was best done by those artists, really very different they were. Read books, look at pictures, but if there are specific questions, I am happy to try to answer them.

I tried to read and see, but unfortunately none of the source not found a clear description of the contribution of these artists in the vanguard. But a lot of descriptions of the influence of the Impressionists and Post-Impressionists in their work. Even in dissertations dedicated to the works of these artists are a big part - is a description of who taught and influenced by one's creativity are. About the most creative is very vague, except, of course, the courage not to be like everyone else. But I think the most interesting works in their art work were 20-30-ies, later all became very cautious.