Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство - Показать сообщение отдельно

Тютчев · 29.07.2010, 02:55

Upgrading Zamoskvorechye

Over the weekend in Moscow was destroyed by the estate of merchants Alexeyev - a complex of buildings of the XIX century, now serving on the spot where the city authorities and investors want to see a modern hotel. More recently, social activists led by "Arhnadzora" celebrated a small victory - the demolition of dilapidated buildings already in Kadashi been frozen. Recent events have shown that these successes have been elusive, but in Moscow I was kind of streets, but not manners.
Manor Alexeyev was on the street Bakhrushina - near the cinema "Five Star", a theatrical museum, as well as the Department of Land Resources in Moscow and drove Zamoskvorechye. This "high" neighborhood, as it has become clear, the estate did not save.
"Arhnadzor reports that the border of the home ownership have not changed since the XVIII century. Nevertheless, the initial appearance of the estate merchant Theodore Alekseevich Alekseev, we only know of the plan area in 1803, as in the Great Moscow Fire of 1812 all of its wooden buildings burned down. Merchant built a new house for 1817. "It is safe to say that this is one of the finest mansions Zamoskvorechye characteristic and very colorful example of a chamber of post Empire - Moscow's unique style that characterizes the artistic tastes of the nobility and the merchants of the Pushkin epoch" - the author writes "Arhnadzora Alexander Frolov. Starting from 1830's and 40's estate changed owners and appearance, but retained the spirit of Moscow. Thus, hypertrophied architectural elements of one of the new buildings, according to Frolov, and constituted the charm of the house: "He provincials, as if moved here from the center of any county of the city."
In January 2009, "Arhnadzor" said the chief manor house on the state protection. However, it turned out that he had already lodged for demolition - at this point LLC Ekobytservis "allowed to build a modern hotel building. "As part of the application of special measures aimed at conservation and regeneration of the historic and urban environment", - said the disposal of the Moscow government.

Читать дальше...

In mid-July, "Arhnadzor sent a letter to Moscow Mayor Yuri Luzhkov and the chairman of the Cultural Heritage Committee Valery Shevchuk. Advocates of historic Moscow noted that building an urban estate partially located within the joint security area historical and cultural monuments, and new construction in these zones is prohibited. Arhnadzorovtsy required to cancel an order to demolish, renovate buildings and estates to include them in the planning hotel complex (since the project involves only "applicative overlay" copies of the two estates facades on the hotel). At the same time appeal to the authorities of activists began picketing at Bakhrushin.
July 21 were the first attempts demolition, which were prevented by the defenders of the estate. However, over the weekend, July 24-25, to save the historic buildings could not. Pickets have not helped, since the police took the side of the investor - the owner of the building. Despite the protests gathered volunteers to buildings drove heavy construction equipment. As a result, by mid-day Sunday the main house and three-storey building were destroyed almost completely, after which the restoration of the estate has lost all meaning. In the heaps of construction waste specialists have seen fragments of the architectural elements that the developer had promised to keep - for example, an old cast-iron staircase.
"Arhnadzor" drew attention to the fact that the demolition was carried out before the prosecutor's office has been checking its legality (recall exactly appeal to the prosecutor's office has suspended the destruction of buildings in Kadashi). His decision to demolish was to make and another body - Moskomnaslediye. However, notes "Arhnadzor" if "the demolition of the main house vandals camouflage applications rejected, then the destruction of three-storey building is not a cover" nothing "because the building was" under the protection of pending applications Moskomnaslediye. " Head of Committee Valery Shevchuk, at the time of demolition of buildings on the link did not come out, but now community activists have decided to seek his resignation.
Subsequently, the authorities took the side of the owner. Prefect of the CAO Alexei Alexandrov said that all the necessary documents for the demolition of the investor are available. Moskomnaslediye Deputy Chairman Aleksei Emelianov said that based on the results of the state historical and cultural examination, it was decided not to refer the estate of the monuments of history and culture.
Expert edition "Russian real estate" noted that, formally, the authorities are right, and told me that usually happens in such cases. "At first, historic building becomes a" detected an object of cultural heritage. "You can rent out, but it is caused by very stringent conditions on the replanning and repair in general. So tight that even the cheapest rent becomes unprofitable. One company still decided to rent. "After that, interest in the administration to protect the house ... weakening sharply Commission Moskomnaslediye, 'weighing the pros and cons', simply denies to one identified object to register as a monument of architecture. And it turns out that a good company, which has taken a house for rent" at a loss 'terribly lucky: it has a preferential right to the reconstruction of the building or its demolition and construction in this part of the new building. " The specialist called this development "ordinary capital scheme.
One of the leaders Arhnadzora "moskvoved Rustam Rahmatullin raised the question of a false understanding of the term" regeneration "in Moscow. According to him, to carry today, and begin to rebuild tomorrow - it is not regeneration. As stated Rahmatullin, must restore what was lost is not a result of the actions themselves "restorers", and any drift in the joint security area must be excluded.
For the estate Alexeyev has entered the Public Chamber: a deliberative body to restore the demolished building. However, the prospects of this requirement is very vague. Perhaps it can be stated: the manor, the starting point for creating a fire which began in 1812, the year 2010-the first experience could not, and without any fire. Such times.
Cyril tadpoles
http://www.lenta.ru/articles/2010/07/26/usadba/

29.07.2010, 02:55	Язык оригинала: Русский #140
Тютчев Гуру Регистрация: 19.09.2008 Сообщений: 5,529 Спасибо: 4,883 Поблагодарили 11,835 раз(а) в 2,947 сообщениях Записей в дневнике: 8 Репутация: 22524	Upgrading Zamoskvorechye Over the weekend in Moscow was destroyed by the estate of merchants Alexeyev - a complex of buildings of the XIX century, now serving on the spot where the city authorities and investors want to see a modern hotel. More recently, social activists led by "Arhnadzora" celebrated a small victory - the demolition of dilapidated buildings already in Kadashi been frozen. Recent events have shown that these successes have been elusive, but in Moscow I was kind of streets, but not manners. Manor Alexeyev was on the street Bakhrushina - near the cinema "Five Star", a theatrical museum, as well as the Department of Land Resources in Moscow and drove Zamoskvorechye. This "high" neighborhood, as it has become clear, the estate did not save. "Arhnadzor reports that the border of the home ownership have not changed since the XVIII century. Nevertheless, the initial appearance of the estate merchant Theodore Alekseevich Alekseev, we only know of the plan area in 1803, as in the Great Moscow Fire of 1812 all of its wooden buildings burned down. Merchant built a new house for 1817. "It is safe to say that this is one of the finest mansions Zamoskvorechye characteristic and very colorful example of a chamber of post Empire - Moscow's unique style that characterizes the artistic tastes of the nobility and the merchants of the Pushkin epoch" - the author writes "Arhnadzora Alexander Frolov. Starting from 1830's and 40's estate changed owners and appearance, but retained the spirit of Moscow. Thus, hypertrophied architectural elements of one of the new buildings, according to Frolov, and constituted the charm of the house: "He provincials, as if moved here from the center of any county of the city." In January 2009, "Arhnadzor" said the chief manor house on the state protection. However, it turned out that he had already lodged for demolition - at this point LLC Ekobytservis "allowed to build a modern hotel building. "As part of the application of special measures aimed at conservation and regeneration of the historic and urban environment", - said the disposal of the Moscow government. Читать дальше... In mid-July, "Arhnadzor sent a letter to Moscow Mayor Yuri Luzhkov and the chairman of the Cultural Heritage Committee Valery Shevchuk. Advocates of historic Moscow noted that building an urban estate partially located within the joint security area historical and cultural monuments, and new construction in these zones is prohibited. Arhnadzorovtsy required to cancel an order to demolish, renovate buildings and estates to include them in the planning hotel complex (since the project involves only "applicative overlay" copies of the two estates facades on the hotel). At the same time appeal to the authorities of activists began picketing at Bakhrushin. July 21 were the first attempts demolition, which were prevented by the defenders of the estate. However, over the weekend, July 24-25, to save the historic buildings could not. Pickets have not helped, since the police took the side of the investor - the owner of the building. Despite the protests gathered volunteers to buildings drove heavy construction equipment. As a result, by mid-day Sunday the main house and three-storey building were destroyed almost completely, after which the restoration of the estate has lost all meaning. In the heaps of construction waste specialists have seen fragments of the architectural elements that the developer had promised to keep - for example, an old cast-iron staircase. "Arhnadzor" drew attention to the fact that the demolition was carried out before the prosecutor's office has been checking its legality (recall exactly appeal to the prosecutor's office has suspended the destruction of buildings in Kadashi). His decision to demolish was to make and another body - Moskomnaslediye. However, notes "Arhnadzor" if "the demolition of the main house vandals camouflage applications rejected, then the destruction of three-storey building is not a cover" nothing "because the building was" under the protection of pending applications Moskomnaslediye. " Head of Committee Valery Shevchuk, at the time of demolition of buildings on the link did not come out, but now community activists have decided to seek his resignation. Subsequently, the authorities took the side of the owner. Prefect of the CAO Alexei Alexandrov said that all the necessary documents for the demolition of the investor are available. Moskomnaslediye Deputy Chairman Aleksei Emelianov said that based on the results of the state historical and cultural examination, it was decided not to refer the estate of the monuments of history and culture. Expert edition "Russian real estate" noted that, formally, the authorities are right, and told me that usually happens in such cases. "At first, historic building becomes a" detected an object of cultural heritage. "You can rent out, but it is caused by very stringent conditions on the replanning and repair in general. So tight that even the cheapest rent becomes unprofitable. One company still decided to rent. "After that, interest in the administration to protect the house ... weakening sharply Commission Moskomnaslediye, 'weighing the pros and cons', simply denies to one identified object to register as a monument of architecture. And it turns out that a good company, which has taken a house for rent" at a loss 'terribly lucky: it has a preferential right to the reconstruction of the building or its demolition and construction in this part of the new building. " The specialist called this development "ordinary capital scheme. One of the leaders Arhnadzora "moskvoved Rustam Rahmatullin raised the question of a false understanding of the term" regeneration "in Moscow. According to him, to carry today, and begin to rebuild tomorrow - it is not regeneration. As stated Rahmatullin, must restore what was lost is not a result of the actions themselves "restorers", and any drift in the joint security area must be excluded. For the estate Alexeyev has entered the Public Chamber: a deliberative body to restore the demolished building. However, the prospects of this requirement is very vague. Perhaps it can be stated: the manor, the starting point for creating a fire which began in 1812, the year 2010-the first experience could not, and without any fire. Such times. Cyril tadpoles http://www.lenta.ru/articles/2010/07/26/usadba/ Миниатюры