Цитата:
Сообщение от Cyril Syzran
Here Oleg Nazarov showed paintings of artists, not entertainers ..
|
Probably. Do not argue. I'm just probably not familiar with the work of Oleg Kuptsova. Belyaev-Gintovt for someone to be an artist, too, but for me - showing PERSON IDEA (
http://www.openspace.ru/art/projects...106/?attempt=1), Dugin me even when life Kuryokhin introduced (in a few days before his death), somewhere in a book signing of his lies, I called a "conspiracy theory" or something like that, so I'm a little in the course. There are people who are known for their creativity, and is - that scandalous mixed IDEAS, which supporters of the search is through the promotion of artistic images.
Miller has already become more like a show-Names. This is the work not for the sake of creativity, but for the show. About Mamysheva Monroe do not speak, received prominence peredevaniem other people - ... - "That's where the true artist."
Sotnikova work I sympathize.
Of course, "New Artists" is a phenomenon, but the reputation built on epotazhe (
http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%AD%...82%D0%B0%D0%B6 ) - rather than a sign of artistic merit (in my opinion).