Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 26.04.2011, 00:10 Язык оригинала: Русский       #10
Авторитет
 
Аватар для Art-lover
 
Регистрация: 25.10.2008
Адрес: Киев
Сообщений: 825
Спасибо: 1,587
Поблагодарили 2,452 раз(а) в 384 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 2
Репутация: 3846
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от fabosch Посмотреть сообщение
Between them, generally speaking, have more in common than might appear. Both phenomena are basically appealing to the ideal. Moreover the domain of ideal and fact, and the other is the central point, without which neither incomprehensible avant-garde, nor drevnegrech. sculpture. Both are not particularly interested in literary (read - the story), part art. Both actually negumanistichny (not to be confused with antigumanistichnostyu), ie, man as such may be interested in them only as a means of expressing the ideal. And the fact that the avant-garde and Greek. Mythology in fact, primarily kosmogonichny, so it does not require proof.
Comparison of the archaic (Greek) and avant-garde total utopias - productive theme, - just because of their incomplete "isomorphism". Greek "negumanoidnost" richer, which is why the inverse with respect to the interpretation of peppershteynovskoy and appeared to me more interesting - and ironic at the same time and sureznee "if you want (Yes, the ideal here and there, but fundamentally different. In the ancient tradition of homo still glimmering in the early morning fog, but this hazy image is already warmed by the human warmth, which is to occur, and in the vanguard of cosmogony is its radical "removal", the fruits of which we have the pleasure to enjoy. I do not think that, being guided by the compass of the vanguard, humans get out of the deep are .. .).



Art-lover вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 2 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо Art-lover за это полезное сообщение:
artcol (26.04.2011), LCR (26.04.2011)