Цитата:
Сообщение от VYACHESLAV
He imported n.h for examination and brought to n.h.
Her're not signed in process ... That is, nobody here is not fault of word.
All the prosecution was trying to sell. But attribution is, as a pretext for sale.
Violation of the rules of movement of cultural property not even mentioned.
|
It is difficult to judge about the detective story to media reports, which often differ "inaccurate".
Slava, you're right, imported work n /x, and take out, according to the examination, had Bryullov museum value.
The Law on the import or export is an interesting article, whereby Rosokhrankultura right to make citizen, exporting cultural value proposal for its redemption, which is "hard to refuse ... But this usually refers to citizens of Russia. Refused a Belgian collector from Russia's citizenship or is a citizen of Russia with dual citizenship? Also the role ...
In this case, everything is difficult, because the circumstances of the case, in fact, nobody knows. (Example of import-export activities at the exhibition will not work - another mechanism).
Added after 17 minutes
Цитата:
Сообщение от Eriksson
experts "write" is extremely difficult. Everyone says: "Vezite now in Russia." Oh how I lured one eskperta that just did not bode well - not go, even crack. Although in principle not refuse ...
|
Eriksson, looking for another expert.
A. Sarabyanov, for example, travels abroad and the invitation does not stop. And can you imagine what it means to evaluate "a collection of Russian avant-garde", and even tell the owner that up to 80%of work - wrong ...