Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 19.03.2010, 16:05 Язык оригинала: Русский       #7
Бывалый
 
Аватар для Причал
 
Регистрация: 10.02.2010
Сообщений: 470
Спасибо: 513
Поблагодарили 927 раз(а) в 324 сообщениях
Репутация: 1854
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky Посмотреть сообщение
And for me, let them and do not know what they know well.
.
Exactly. That is what I wanted to say.
Future engineers are not obliged to distinguish Bush from Watteau.

This is the same as if the future art historians were forced to mark to distinguish between parts and assemblies for mining machines and systems.

Compel a fool to pray to God - he and his forehead will break - navvodili lot humanities in technical colleges. Students learn the future profession, in fact, once.

Perhaps it is because Russia is now buying Boeings and the state were forced to establish draconian tariffs on the import of foreign cars to own, projected these "engineers" scrap shake off.

And do not say that knowledge of world culture - an indispensable attribute of a good specialist, and that in pre-revolutionary Russia, each officer was able to play the piano, and watercolors zabatsat poem lady in the album nakropat.
Future officers began to teach in early childhood and did not gallop around Europe, as now - the whole world history of art in one semester.
A future foreign aircraft manufacturers and mashinodelateli, yes, are obliged to listen to a certain number of humanities disciplines. But, first by choice, and secondly the specific courses - such as the history of theater in Antiquity ", in the third - not at the expense of basic disciplines.



Причал вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 3 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо Причал за это полезное сообщение:
AlexanderG (20.03.2010), dedulya37 (20.03.2010), Кирилл Сызранский (19.03.2010)