Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 19.03.2010, 10:31 Язык оригинала: Русский       #4
Гуру
 
Аватар для sergejnowo
 
Регистрация: 24.02.2009
Адрес: Гамбург
Сообщений: 3,845
Спасибо: 3,565
Поблагодарили 4,959 раз(а) в 1,455 сообщениях
Репутация: 9306
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от BAGIRA Посмотреть сообщение
It looks like a 1800-e
No it does not.
is the end of the 19 th century. Judging by the color and condition of the canvas, the work may be even younger.
Weight cracelures been "made" relentless stretch the canvas, where a "reserve" of the canvas, cracelures not, and where "reserve" was not, really is not very decent crack. The work is written not from nature, too much is not comparable items presented simultaneously. The painting was done in the style of landscapes, the 18 th, early 19 th centuries, but that the work of younger, viewed on writing style.
I have a feeling that the artist actually was able to write more realistically and accurately. However knowingly "mowed" by naivnyak past centuries.



sergejnowo вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 2 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо sergejnowo за это полезное сообщение:
Allena (19.03.2010), BAGIRA (21.03.2010)