Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 14.03.2010, 21:57 Язык оригинала: Русский       #1082
Гуру
 
Аватар для artcol
 
Регистрация: 13.09.2008
Сообщений: 12,074
Спасибо: 6,206
Поблагодарили 6,552 раз(а) в 3,043 сообщениях
Репутация: 12904
Отправить сообщение для artcol с помощью Skype™
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Pavel Посмотреть сообщение
I confess, made precisely on the basis of its own and other artists experience I am talking about.

Added after 9 minutes
 There were repetitions of Matisse? Picasso? But a sign of excellence in the face.
Here is a common error when taking his taste for the general opinion. Beautiful painting a loose concept. There are more reliable criteria, uniqueness, originality, etc. This is a luxury item and in circulation, there is something degrading as in commercial art. Therefore, Matisse and Picasso worth millions, but we have in circulation is that there is a secret.
Painting is not a luxury. You live in what time? This is the subject of the status of consumption .

- Yesterday I returned from New York, see what stylish tie bought it for 500 bucks!
   - Well, bro, you lopuhnulsya! Exactly the same tie I saw yesterday on the Arbat for a thousand bucks.


There are no great works of draw? Charts, for example? Objects of everyday use? We Miro general idee fixe was - to make art more democratic, to introduce it in masses, so to speak!



artcol вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо artcol за это полезное сообщение:
Santa (20.05.2011)