Samvel,
We are often attacked by various great inventors, the last thing was - this assessment based on visual comparisons of the brightness of the pigments.
Prior to this, the technique of DNA testing and the above-mentioned nuclear method. Technologists laugh over this, but I think that any theory or technique has a right to exist. :-)
However, if you remember the school curriculum, about the vortex of water in nature and that the painting is a living creature that can dial into a liquid and then give it (that is, if it then and there was up to 40 years after the fortieth will exactly :-))..... but amateurish arguments. if interested ask technologists and posted on the forum their opinion.
[color="# 666686"]Posted 17 minutes later[/color]
dedulya37,
Of course there is, for the heirs there simplified regime examination - certification. Certification is used as a "substitute" assessment. This service can benefit both authors and their legitimate heirs. Naturally, you can make a reference number for Stozharov, the same thing we did for the fund Konchalovsky, for the Grabar Institute of white. We have data on the ground, pigment and binder, the classics, Russian avant-garde and the Silver Age.
|