Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 10.03.2010, 23:54 Язык оригинала: Русский       #1054
Гуру
 
Аватар для Peter
 
Регистрация: 27.01.2010
Адрес: Москва
Сообщений: 1,168
Спасибо: 5,106
Поблагодарили 4,043 раз(а) в 921 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 4
Репутация: 8099
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от tiffany Посмотреть сообщение
A remarkable theme, and very interesting discussions. I have long been tormented by one question. I would like to hear the views of the forum. How important is a strong one in the works of the artist hyped? Is it important to skip the early (non-student) work, if they are very different from the mainstream? If an artist and currently works in different styles and directions, likes to experiment, whether it is a positive factor for promotion, or better say nothing about it, skip all that different from the mainstream? Especially if the artist works in a diametrically opposite of directions - the realism and abstraction.
I think that when an artist works in different directions, it is certainly good for his own razvitiya.Esli talk about entering the art market, it should work in style, which is closer to the artist and which created the most powerful raboty.Hudozhnik should have to remember the creative person (this is good for the market). Personalka should be considered and only the best, no rannih.Dopuskaetsya couple works in a different style and modest razveske.Nu acknowledged master of any experimentation will be only in his favor, will maintain a continuing interest to him.



Peter вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 11 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо Peter за это полезное сообщение:
kozhinart (11.03.2010), L-ana64110 (11.03.2010), LCR (11.03.2010), noart (27.03.2010), spigo (10.03.2010), sur (16.03.2010), tiffany (11.03.2010), Артём (11.03.2010), Илья Максимов (11.03.2010), Хранитель укропа (06.08.2013)