Цитата:
Сообщение от Guriev, Igor
Do not quite understand.
Repin (in the best years) the same realism that, for instance, Millet, Chardin, Guardi, Velazquez and others
Do not see any differences.
You can say that C-F school "realism" of another type?
|
Yes that's right - abstracted realism
that was not Repinsky realism
Repin, although I really respect and kitsch have nicknamed it did not,
for artists' posleabstraktsionistov "
so to speak
depicted object is only
cause
for painting as an organization of color and form in the plane of the canvas
and how to write books:
story concocted for any resemblance to real people and events
artist is not responsible
therefore such categories as
"and I got the color," rather than a crooked vase "
such an artist simply can not think
Added after 5 minutes
Цитата:
Сообщение от LCR
Of course, you're right. But I talked about the work of these artists in the years 1940-60. Where, in my opinion, can and should speak about the rejection of abstraction. Returning to her Diberkorna (Series Ocean Park Paintings), and Bischoff goes beyond the reporting period. Nevertheless, I admit my guilt - I have not specified the time frame rassmatrizhvaemogo directions.
|
thanks
the only thing that I
"rejection of abstraction" does not seem
return to the old realism
as some opportunistic step back
or floating with the party line
such as the pampered and that's enough --
need to do business again
on the contrary - I think it is a movement
perfectly reasonable and natural
is an honest study of borders in both directions
and finding its place among