Цитата:
Сообщение от Eugene
Vyacheslav, We are not lawyers with you, just wish the collector from Belgium udachi.Pravo private property should all respect, including the museum workers.
|
You write about a lawyer in the domestic ponimanii.Na really lawyers (and doctors) have spetsializatsiyu.Moya specialization is not related to such matters and still want to draw attention here on some points
1.Gr.Pevzner with the picture were Customs formalnosti.Soglasites that this would not have happened if the customs declaration was not completed correctly.
2.Kartina is not a commodity - it is clearly recorded.
3.Kartina passes the examination. Ten days passed and Pevzner charged with smuggling.
4.Po law accusation is brought after an investigation at the request or on recorded facts of the violation. In this case, the conditions of entry outlined in the declaration. That's where these ten days.
According to the law, investigations are conducted with the participation of all defendants as witnesses in the presence of advokata.I only then later charged.
Lawyer collector Anna Stavitskaya considers these charges unfounded: "Pevzner could declare now only in the regime of temporary importation. He could not point to any author, nor the cost of painting, because he did not know them before the examination in the Russian Museum. If he did, then it would be contraband "- explains the defender.
Strange but all these accusations are so vehemently rejects the lawyer are a consequence of major violations - fixed intention or attempted sale. Here's what should challenge the lawyers. If they will fight, everything will return to their seats.
What about perspektivah.Esli the prosecution will present in court even the slightest credible evidence of intent of sale, paintings, Mr. Pevsner not seen.