Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 03.03.2010, 18:37 Язык оригинала: Русский       #52
Гуру
 
Аватар для LCR
 
Регистрация: 29.04.2008
Адрес: Париж
Сообщений: 6,211
Спасибо: 18,677
Поблагодарили 38,263 раз(а) в 5,446 сообщениях
Репутация: 29883
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky Посмотреть сообщение
We are talking about:

Is it possible to successfully sell the work, unable to "thin. Values"?
It seems to me, no.
Another question is about themselves "thin. Values".
Someone sees a "thin. Values" in the "lilac still lifes, and someone Give" abstract expressionism ".
But the most tasteless thing as you sell?
I do not know how to sell a naked maiden with a sword riding a tiger, for example.
Or a white Pegasus ... Krasiiiiiivo!
Although this may cause the viewer with emotion-now and thin. Value ".
To me, it can, without problems. Look, look at this Gapchinskuyu or Galchinsky - that is not "quite tasteless thing? Or is Taka artist, Hans Zattska - not just tasteless, but the quintessence of bad taste, just stunned - because someone is selling it, even on this forum ads, I think, were. I now climbed to watch the price (http://www.findartinfo.com/search/li..._P._Ronsard%29) - is about as early Monticelli, can you imagine?
In general, the horrific examples mass.

In one you, Kirill, who can not, there is a dozen experts, only whistle

Another thing - what is the artistic value. But this tale of a white bull, we are not going to repeat, right? I still do not decide, just badmouthing go!
Изображения
 



LCR вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 6 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо LCR за это полезное сообщение:
DSF (04.03.2010), NATA NOVA (03.03.2010), Peter (03.03.2010), Tana (03.03.2010)