Цитата:
Сообщение от Tjutchev
Lorart,
...
Poor Russia's professional art critics, or, shall we say, her immaturity, and lack of information on the art market are a significant factor hindering a more efficient functioning of Russia's art market.
|
Dear, Tiutchev! Thank you for your reply. I reasoned explanation. It is with you in this case agrees. By all counts.
However, while specific outputs can not see. Do not teach the same people write, so even on such a topic ... And difficult to motivate. Alas, much more in demand and pay-published anywhere - or secular, yellow and glossy chronicler, or politics, the economy (which is understandable) ...
The art language is also unlikely to attract attention - even more so inexperienced, but interested newcomers.
Added after 10 minutes
Цитата:
Сообщение от Tjutchev
Lorart, By the way, this theme - one of the most talked about parties salon. (Theme efficiency of information support of the passenger compartment.) 
|
At this so-called "mass grave", has long been funny to watch. The fact that this is a simple exchange of logos and other "services" ... between the press-service of the Interior (the more ... experts ...) and marketing services, media, that place advertising module (again, as you correctly noticed, for those familiar with the salon - just a reminder too much, others - agree on such advertising).
The editors, apparently, so is out of this "support" that same "NG" lay the preview and the opening of the Salon Friday newspaper, where there are no word about the salon. And antique columnist Yu Vinogradov writes in this issue about Swedish design ...
Yes, many media, maximum - announcements of releases published.
It seems that even in the info-cross-promotional and TP. - Any other infa, market survey, interviews with participants of the Salon, with art dealers, collectors, etc. - is perceived as advertising.