Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 28.02.2010, 21:36 Язык оригинала: Русский       #256
Banned
 
Регистрация: 17.02.2010
Адрес: Ukraine , Kiev
Сообщений: 333
Спасибо: 166
Поблагодарили 394 раз(а) в 180 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 24
Репутация: 789
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от NATA NOVA Посмотреть сообщение
noart, my dear, I'm clearly asked: where your proof that creativity Gapchinskoy unoriginal?
Show.
(And do not "la-la", away from the answer.)
Show.
I have no desire to play with you in a daisy on Gopchinskoy.
And just as I will not enlighten you on its (creative).
If you have this (bee phenomenon) are interested in - what is the problem, now there is an invention of mankind as the Internet and be so kind to take advantage of this opportunity.
I personally Gopchinskaya not interesting, and discuss its business projects, I have no desire.
If you do it and it works like you without any difficulty could buy one of her imperishable works of art - I think it is you give up and sell for a lot cheaper than $ 100000 -)))

Although it is not those who can not know how the pictures Gopchinskoy remain in the future and it will already see the descendants.
In this context, is not my opinion or anyone else.
With words. E, Tar - Vasnetsov and Aivazovsky painted very badly, I tell you as a professional art historian and expert on the art of 19 century. And even then people said: compare modern daub with the work of Titian.

You can also think of Van Gogh and so on.
I always try to express their opinion on a given topic.
So you should not provoke me and ask what is the evidence.
Hasta la vista el amigo




Последний раз редактировалось noart; 28.02.2010 в 22:11.
noart вне форума   Ответить с цитированием