Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 28.02.2010, 16:23 Язык оригинала: Русский       #26
Гуру
 
Регистрация: 12.10.2008
Сообщений: 2,430
Спасибо: 16,535
Поблагодарили 3,169 раз(а) в 901 сообщениях
Репутация: 5353
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Lorart Посмотреть сообщение
venerated posted Tyutchev above link to the publication in the Independent newspaper.
http://www.ng.ru/culture/2010-02-18/8_salon.html
as well as fully contained very publication. for those who link will not be able to pass.

and why now is a place here? what's the point? people clearly first wrote about the Salon. There are people (like Markina, which are also cited, or Boutkevitch and TAs. - which are perfectly write about antiques, antique market, including on the race for many years). Well, or new talented reporters. But why do so first press release published. Then link that blunt generalities repeats the worst place of the official release. If you really give references - that for something worthwhile, interesting ...
In my opinion, sorry.
Цитата:
Сообщение от Eugene Посмотреть сообщение
Lorart, Photo good, but you're right information on antiques, Russian art, Soviet art (the period of 1930-1950 years)., Old masters, porcelain practically no.
Lorart, Eugene Well, so add your links if you have more complete information, any message is always possible to add, I'll just thankful



Tana вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо Tana за это полезное сообщение:
манна (28.02.2010)