Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 03.11.2008, 15:39 Язык оригинала: Русский       #24
Авторитет
 
Регистрация: 17.04.2008
Сообщений: 940
Спасибо: 66
Поблагодарили 1,047 раз(а) в 392 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 1
Репутация: 624
По умолчанию

Exactly. Everyone who appreciates the effect of this article let even remember what else from the news. And if you remember, it will evaluate itself on how it changed his worldview. In the same news of what they write? Objectively speaking about politics? No. On the economy? No. So suck Chernuhi of the areas where on the head will not give. There is full of articles about medicine and that. Treatment is that it stopped? By the way I grew cold to the press when, after a charity auction for me personally, as one of the organizers, several newspapers interviewed, where I gave a detailed account of that money will go, and so on. When the article came out, I gasped, does not mean that. On charity single word, as we have just goats and crooks from the clan Luzhkov. This Kommersant way, but to Luzhkov's all had nothing to do, just Kommersant then "wetted" Luzhkov - that's clipped.



Сергеич вне форума   Ответить с цитированием