Цитата:
Сообщение от Semen Semenovich
At the auction the picture should not fall on the basis of survival (excuse) of the artist, but for its artistic value ... And the studio is not always cheaper to obtain. In self-respecting artists working with reputable galleries, just the opposite. The artist allowed to come to the wrong person in the holy of holies, spent a lot of time and nerves to communicate, to pay 10 percent of the gallery (from the transaction amount). A buyer was able to select and interact with the maestro ... So pay more than the gallery, not less. That is my understanding that cooperation. Then we can say that the market is civilized, the formation of ..., where each has its place.
|
Are you talking about the ideal relationship. But, life happens so rarely. Yes, of course, if the artist will be offered a very lucrative contract for him, only then to be insane to sell out of the shop is cheaper. However, such contracts rarely offer gallery owners, and artists from time to time it seems that the workshop can earn more than the shares with the gallery owners.
Then Paul asked a specific question
"And who is asked to sell a previously purchased the picture, no exchange, namely to sell?" What do you say?
And yet, at the auction (the West) get a lot of things, not necessarily on the basis of artistic value. It is all about price alone and nothing more. There are a large quantity of auctions around the world, information on sales which is decentralized.