Цитата:
Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky
I read the topic compromise. There were some thoughts, but that topic is now closed (why?).
And the second point that I made from the threads:
Many participants have already complained nazoylevye random comments, in their opinion, but aggressive in their ignorance, the participants.
I understand that the face-control and intellect control the entrance to the forum is not set, but then the administration should undertake awareness-raising some or ruthlessly cleaned theme from incompetent bleating.
Otherwise, the forum is just the bleating and left.
And if the participants painters think that the topic of soil and quality canvases are all interesting, they are mistaken: such "elementary discovery" is not the forum for this level.
Sorry, this is not an evening art school for adults uncles and aunts. Adults uncles and aunts can about these and Ahaz learn from textbooks.
|
It is very unpleasant to read, when people who identify themselves as artists, can afford to sling mud at other artists. More successful or famous. Enough to browse messages in the past week. Most of these "geniuses" that devotes no less time than watering the dirt of those who actually works today in the art business.
In fact the site on investing in art. If more - on the art business. I want to talk about the problems of art-business, and not discuss the history of the mother who is more valuable from the present site of artists. What is it? The notorious "positive discrimination"? Demonstration of a false liberalism?
And the right to listen to all this malevolence and teachings from someone really something dobivshegosya. How to advance his art as a commodity, and actually in the art has reached any heights.
I would be all right in half with mud, but at least a grain of some useful information to catch. So after all is not.