Actually, the theme was very sad, but on the other hand, is very indicative:
We are in Moscow, for example, were missing a great many monuments, if it were not popular subscription. Can anybody imagine a monument to Pushkin Square without Opekushin? - But he, gentlemen, by subscription, from the ruble to accept contributions ...
Well as monuments Gogol, Dostoevskmu, Ostrovsky ...
With regard to the restoration of what is already there (for 30 - 40 - 50%) - both the famous "Last Supper" began to collapse even when the Da Vinci did not complete it, and he also became its first restorer. How much over the past century, people made their own hands to this work - is unknown. We know only one thing - many future generations will thank those unsung artists for what it is.
I was lucky, I saw the frescoes Rublev. In Zvenigorod, they are especially good! A new generation, it seems, will know the name of Andrei Rublev by Tarkovsky's films ... If all this movie will look.
And find oligarch who would have decided all the problems ... I guess for someone to exit.
Only if you do not make investments in culture in general and our unique artistic heritage in particular - that anyone who needs an investment in private collections? Well, just a generation for whom the heirs but they will be of interest? Money will come and those quickly from circulation (I mean popular topics about the dollar and euro)
Correct the subject could only holiday: All of the all-Russia men's day! All the best!
|