Цитата:
Сообщение от Buscador
Quote:
Note from Artem View Post
As an artist I feel that the school is called the Crimea, but it is somehow very narrowly, for example Zakharov, Bortnikov, Stolyarenko, I make it for development, that artists are not constrained by such well-known masters, and will come with development and other ARC and other school. Is not it? And then the Crimean school would blur the concept, and therefore it is not.
The concept of "School" - it is always narrowly ... And no need to lock himself - need to evolve. But the unique color which brings Zakharov and others - for me and there Crimean school. Today, unfortunately, bright followers no (or almost no). Maybe it will disappear from the latest artists ... Such is life. You have another opinion - it is your right. Not everyone is an artist who lives in the Crimea is the representative of the Crimean schools (and the Crimean artists - of course). Was Zakarpatskaya School - original, distinctive ... But after two generations, it has practically disappeared no ... Each has its own destiny.
|
The school is a master + students + less mastermind associates, as in the case Barbizontsami.
Imitators do not count towards the school, the followers of the school can only be disciples or followers.
But in the 20. taken was to call the school and a group of artists whose work is connected and the edge of the plot echoes ... turns out that the Crimean artists can be called a school, with an eye for art ..... though it is not quite correct ..