[Тютчев]

Сообщение от FAIv

Shishkin - this corn! Large and painful - of Russia's antique market. Aivazovsky - second corn

Сообщение от FAIv

sergejnowo, Well, I do not like Shishkina, I do not like.

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

And who likes something? "One, two, and obchelsya ...

Shishkin and Aivazovsky - corn antique market! Lord be with you! Corn antique market - is ill-educated art historians, collectors and dealers. Those who in their ignorance and snobbishness forget that at the masterpieces Aivazovsky and Shishkin brought all subsequent generations of Russian artists. You do not like their work? Well, well! Not all train admire them. Let it be, and that view! Moreover, the denial of the significance of their art can not be taken seriously! Well, judge for yourself. Whose opinions will be considered? In the opinion of Tretyakov, Diaghilev, Wrubel, Juon, Nesterova, Krymova, Serov, Levitan, Polenova and the other, or with the opinion of those who have a very superficial understanding of creativity Shishkin and Aivazovsky? The question, of course, rhetorical. Everything I mentioned above and many others appreciated the artistic and wrote about it. And many of them had their work in their collections.

For example, I wrote about the artist AYVAZOVSKOE Juon: "Among the artists of the XIX century the name of the largest marine painter IK Aivazovsky are most popular. Who has not dreamed of seeing the sea at least once in your life? "Who did not see the sea, he prayed to God not" - says a folk proverb. The element of the sea - great captivating beauty, has always deceived people. However, it is a blind force that needs overcoming. With deep truth Aivazovsky showed the tragedy of sea storms, the beauty of peace, pictures sunrises and tales of moonlit nights. "

 And this is what he's napisalal on Shishkin: "How to Kuindzhi was steppe, and for Aivazovsky sea, so to Shishkin was a forest. He admired them during the day, in full light, in the sunlight - like a true realist. Rigorous tapestry ship and mast of the forest were to him like a stately colonnades of classical architecture. Inhaling warm resinous air, he heard "rustling their peaks" and cries of songbirds. He loved the woods as his master, as a connoisseur of qualities and characteristics of tree species. Growing up on a lonely expanse of pine-tree he - love - listened to the same extent as the dense forest porch. Realism Shishkina its unique tactile truthfulness and aromatic picturesque completed skill. "

 I still agree with the opinion of the masters, but I'd add. Man can not understand Malevich or Kandinsky, because of their inexperience (unprepared), but to be indifferent to the masterpieces of Shishkin and Aivazovsky impossible. To do this you have to be a snob, or just too unsympathetic man!