Цитата:
Сообщение от spigo
in 100 or 200 years, it disputes the.
|
And tomorrow? Incidentally, the question "Why?" - Has a lot of options for response, but not the main thing.
Цитата:
Сообщение от spigo
10 "no"-once "yes"
|
10:1 - it does not score, it's hockey.
Well, on the other hand ... once started, after all, with Zverev, how "real" (I mean objectively) to attribute his work? I understand that the topic Nenova, but I have here and the general and personal interests have ... Therefore afford.
Because the method for a particular author is very fragile - a connoisseur. Good medod, but as a part of. Here, alas, the remaining parts do not work (spektrogramy sorts and searches of cadmium, often there can be Provenance, checked at least once). There remains one component. And the sentence. But still,
A sentence (without appeal).
That you like Silaev. I have nothing against Silaeva not have, but against "one Silaeva" I have (Zverev Center I do not consider).
Here, for example: I have a job. Circumstances of "gaining" I know. Well, you can find two or three witnesses to gain (although it was in 82, for example). Who would believe that it is not false witnesses? Who will monitor the logic of the process? Right ...
The work itself?
Well, probably I have seen paintings, of respect for me, Valeria Stanislavovich, but I saw them a lot and the profession can somehow judge. And then plug - 7000 RUR - $ 10 000, minimum.
If the force (or any other single expert) says "NO" is 7000 RUR forever (if at all angles not write it fufel. If you write, then - 0 RUR)))
Something is very wrong.