Тема: Shishkin
Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 17.02.2010, 05:51 Язык оригинала: Русский       #76
Местный
 
Аватар для lazycat
 
Регистрация: 25.12.2008
Адрес: Москва
Сообщений: 210
Спасибо: 9
Поблагодарили 126 раз(а) в 59 сообщениях
Репутация: 252
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky Посмотреть сообщение
After this landscape, it was another 7 things (not rasmatrivaya category Attrib., There's a remarkable moment), put up for auction with works of authorship Shishkin. 3 of them were sold.
Namely (in chronology):
The Brook
Hammer price USD 600,000
EUR 407,880 - USD 600,000 - GBP 364,980
Estimate USD 650,000 - 850,000
Medium Oil /canvas
Sales date 11/2/2009
Location New York NY (US)
Size 77.5x62 cm - (30 1/2x24 3 /8 in)
Auction house Sotheby's
Dated --
Lot number 19
Distinguishing marks signed Bas Droite
Notes Moscow, Tretyakov Gallery, 1948

_________________________
Woodland Grove
 Hammer price GBP 100,000
EUR 111,210 - USD 166,810 - GBP 100,000
Estimate GBP 80,000 - 120,000
Medium Oil /paper /canvas
Sales date 11/30/2009
Location London (GB)
Size 46x33 cm - (18 1/8x13 in)
Auction house Sotheby's
Dated --
Lot number 204
Distinguishing marks - Bas Gauche 

______________________
Forest Clearing
Hammer price GBP 65,000
EUR 72,286 - USD 108,426 - GBP 65,000
Estimate GBP 40,000 - 60,000
Medium Oil /canvas /board
Sales date 12/1/2009
Location London (GB)
Size 38x29.5 cm - (15x11 5 /8 in)
Auction house Sotheby's
Dated c.1890
Lot number 308
Distinguishing marks - Bas Droite


Note, The Brook was sold too, for decent money.
Hammer price USD 600,000, it is not an auction of restitution.
The problem is that the auction "record" has nothing to do with our realities. Today's auction "sale" rather indicate the level of corruption auction houses, rather than the reality.

Added after 13 minutes
Цитата:
Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky Посмотреть сообщение
lazycat,

It is good that there are people who boldly and openly declare that "Korovin Pobol I understand many of today's experts on the artist."
It is good that the message of "large set of standard X-rays in the Grabar" they laugh.
It is good that they can see through the monitor authenticity "sketch" in size


All this is wonderful.
It is not clear to me only the relationship of such experts to other participants in the forum, not as talented, capable and knowledgeable.
Quite simply, Cyril! "Masters of sports of all kinds of sports" - is a serious side effect of the Internet. Boltanul nonsense with a serious air and no one to answer not drag - net boltologiya. And if you do not understand or did not see, it is better to keep silent.

Added after 18 minutes
Цитата:
Сообщение от K-Maler Посмотреть сообщение
Now it is all too often ... Since was not accepted (in Soviet times) to sign and now relatives and friends to sign the front side, because required by customers, and this is in some sense legitimate and even necessary. For example, the practice was to hang pictures in hotels and other public places, etc. Anyone coming up could read the artist's name. Bother with signs people do not want and can not, and it was then not easy to make a plate. As a signature is nothing sacred, it is not very convenient to display on the canvas, there is always artificial, even when the artist himself puts it, sometimes it is hard drawn, it does not scratch, which no one could repeat ... It is important to match, I know that expressing controversial opinions and do not in all cases, of course, so you can do. This observation may relate mostly artists of the Soviet era ... Especially because this is happening constantly.
A real-life examples can lead? Or so purely hypothetical?




Последний раз редактировалось lazycat; 17.02.2010 в 06:09. Причина: Добавлено сообщение
lazycat вне форума   Ответить с цитированием