Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 14.02.2010, 19:02 Язык оригинала: Русский       #273
Гуру
 
Аватар для Veronic
 
Регистрация: 17.12.2008
Адрес: Украина Мукачево, Венгрия Хевиз
Сообщений: 2,165
Спасибо: 1,793
Поблагодарили 1,718 раз(а) в 574 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 4
Репутация: 2879
Отправить сообщение для Veronic с помощью Skype™
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Mona Посмотреть сообщение


"I do not believe it!" as saying Stanislavsky. It is the researcher? scientist? where this information? he (Kozlov), their quotes by page and with all the instructions? As usual, partial truth, with the addition of fried facts from the popular magazine. Are you kidding? what is this source? Who believes this? Today Kozlov wrote about Van Gogh, and tomorrow about the Indians and all he is equally well understood? Votimeno, that speech and that iskusstvoedcheskie popular articles - this is mostly rubbish to forcing the public to buy. And who would buy a magazine, if "open" about Van Gogh?

Mona, that is, you are hinting that the author has sucked this version of the finger?
But, in the original language, look for this information, I probably will not, Van Gogh is not the artist from whom I would be buried in the bowels of the internet and literature, and indeed on my preferences you know.




Последний раз редактировалось Veronic; 14.02.2010 в 19:20.
Veronic вне форума   Ответить с цитированием