[artcol]

Сообщение от sergejnowo

A summary of this generalized conclusion of the "built" on the basis of this source of a given situation, personal and social experience and intuition.
Base source data, if not ironic at all different. An event different people perceive it differently.
Therefore, such a "personal" but a summary of the dispute and deceit to nothing. But to argue and deceive I have no desire.
Example on "investment in the old masters." In this section, the forum, with rapture laid out the data on one or another of the great classics for the sale of $ 3,000,000 or even $ 10,000,000. Yet nobody analyzes.
Who bought? An individual or a museum or a financial structure?
Why buy? Investment, washing money or museum exhibit?
Where is the money Zine? Own or others? Maybe with the drug or from the sale of weapons?
What is the historical and artistic value is precisely this work?
And in general, for the first 20 classics from the old masters, well, quite impossible to draw conclusions about the state of the market under the name of the "old masters"
Who here on the forum in a position to lay out 10 lemons?
I am sure even the tough guys from Gazprom are not ready for such feats.
That's me to the fact that these amounts are not an indicator of the market. In essence, the price of 98%of the market "old masters" have fallen.
So it turns out that the one who draws on original data from the media and bluntly, without analysis, taking them for the truth has a "phony" base source data.

Exactly. I only have prokomentiruyu this:

Сообщение от sergejnowo

That's me to the fact that these amounts are not an indicator of the market. In essence, the price of 98%of the market "old masters" have fallen.

Prices fell, but fell not on what happened reassessment heritage values of these "old masters". Just dropped everything - the economy became less money (or credit, of course). And what eventually happens? How to understand art investor? In dell'arte or in the financial markets and the global economy?