[artcol]

Сообщение от Seriy

Shapovalov made a tattoo on a penny at world prices, it is all told in detail. He had a working idea, understanding that the public needed flair. Later composers, poets, singers - all worked on the general idea.

Shapovalov - arts technologies, and curators in most cases - art. Gelman exception.

From 1992 to 1993 he studied advertising and marketing in the insurance company "Slavia" and the pension fund "capital of Russia" in Saratov. In 93-th year of business firms began to develop in Moscow, but a year later the capital of the offices had to close off. Nevertheless Shapovalov stayed in Moscow. Until 2000 he worked in PR, marketing and advertising. Developed advertising concepts, writing scripts commercials ...
In 2007 he became co-owner of online store Mp3search.ru

Сообщение от Seriy

But after reading an incredible series of publications LCR of the German Expressionist Blue Horseman and all the vanguard of the first third of the 20 th century, I have approved the opinion that they all worked like a swarm of bees, all borrowed from each other in an open, enriched - subjects, composition , a palette-all passed from artist to artist, enriched and returned back into the general treasury. And Kandinsky and Picasso, they were not lonely rock, they were one of many. And I am sure that if Picasso sometimes indistinguishable from Leger or the marriage is the normal creative process.
Therefore, if the gallery owners and curators are not literate and will not offer the life-giving trend, then the artist alone is unlikely that he would do.

These people have shared views on art and the world. And everything else (technique, composition, palette) - it's not important in this context.
And what is your outlook?