[Seriy]

Pavel, in my childhood I liked Petrov-Vodkin, these Petrograd Madonna. Then, when I became acquainted with the early Renaissance, including Giotto and then realized that he just picked up their style, palette and moved to his material. But since childhood impressions are very strong, but now my early Renaissance strongly commends Vodkin.

 Alexander, after a grand exhibition in the garage, many were wondering, but why our gallery owners are inefficient, China, Malaysia, India, half of the developing world is present in kontempor lists of successful artists. It is not just about money. Shapovalov made a tattoo on a penny at world prices, it is all told in detail. He had a working idea, understanding that the public needed flair. Later composers, poets, singers - all worked on the general idea.
 Recently, in a well-respected well-known publicist Learn sounded a similar theme, he accused the country's leading fotogalerista that she knows nothing about photography. Therefore promotes appropriate gloomy and hopeless artists.
 Of course, the artist himself has to think, as a creative unit.
But after reading an incredible series of publications LCR of the German Expressionist Blue Horseman and all the vanguard of the first third of the 20 th century, I have approved the opinion that they all worked like a swarm of bees, all borrowed from each other in an open, enriched - subjects, composition , a palette-all passed from artist to artist, enriched and returned back into the general treasury. And Kandinsky and Picasso, they were not lonely rock, they were one of many. And I am sure that if Picasso sometimes indistinguishable from Leger or the marriage is the normal creative process.
Therefore, if the gallery owners and curators are not literate and will not offer the life-giving trend, then the artist alone is unlikely that he would do.