Цитата:
Сообщение от Mona
Who is SERIOUSLY suggests that the philosophy of art is secondary in relation to art history? art history just do not do science, and narrative secular discipline. TS base for writing an article in Ladies' Magazine. Few art critic raised above, and that is beyond art history (Chegodaev for example)
|
Frankly, I think that the philosophy of art is secondary to the Art. Because the conviction that a man who does not know art, ie object can not be truly interested in their philosophical constructions. In other words, talk about art, and even more so, to build complex speculative construction, not knowing it is very difficult. And do art studies in his field is quite possible without Horní theories. Though I must admit that reading these compositions is sometimes very interesting and useful. The flexibility of some kind appears ...
Yes, and philosophy, to be really consistent, it is not science in the strict sense of the word.