Цитата:
Сообщение от Pavel
The analysis is done not for the artist. The analysis determines the value of the artist. If you are trading then you know how much more valuable than the original painting. People are paying money for it.
|
No. In one test of novelty, in the absence of other positive qualities, do not pay.
Besides
there is absolutely healthy people - there nedoobsledovannye if the viewer does not see where the legs grow, maybe he just is not well know the history of world art
By the way, remember the situation, described by Peter on before the last page
Цитата:
|
Artist curve, but is silent, if there really zhivoy.Kakoy analysis? Townsfolk listen with bated breath ...
|
?
So - at a time when the art historian rummages in his "origins" - the artist feels himself caught in plagiarism, yes, and is not alive and dead eu.
But the potential buyer eager to catch the names of artists with whom the perpetrator has compared the art celebration. He is not even very listens to it for what reason they were mentioned. And if even one name of the client mentioned at least once in my life heard - the chances that he will buy a picture of the artist's great increase .