Цитата:
Сообщение от Berth
YB. LCR, I did not know that you are the wife of the artist.
And I have a long-standing rule never to discuss the work of artists with their wives.
In themselves can, with their wives pardon me.
|
But I do not suggest that you discuss the work Roginsky, especially with me. I put a rule to move away from all the discussions associated with the name of my husband, at least here on the forum. And such, I dare assure you, were
If desired, however, you can find the theme in the discussion which I will be able to participate - because of its weak forces, of course - a such neutral territory.
Цитата:
Сообщение от Berth
That is the whole problem can be reduced to "Who are the judges?"
|
It could be stated so. I am more than happy with my wording, because it does not lead to disowned judges whose views are not like them, but simply says freedom of choice, but I'm ready to agree with yours.
Цитата:
Сообщение от Berth
need only to choose who you take yourself to the judge and not to expect that those whom you have not chosen will share the views of judges chosen.
|
Why? As a judge I did not choose. Basically my opinion is to me self-sufficient, and acknowledge it, I do not need it (although, of course, it is nice). And the fact that different people have their opinions about Roginsky - or de Stael, or Kossoff, or Dibenkorna - then what to do with this? They have every right. Another thing is that I also reserve the full right to disagree with them (and try to put them in intellectually as much as possible uncomfortable position - in war as in war).